ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 秋晨小仔
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求大牛鉴定小女句子简化方法!求助prep07语法一题it 的指代~着急啊急死了!

[复制链接]
11#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-13 11:50:40 | 只看该作者
我觉得Prep07比Prep08要纠结多了~~!有木有~~!!
-- by 会员 单调唱 (2012/5/13 11:48:18)


有!!大有!!
貌似07的句子比较难!!
还没有系统做08的语法.。。。准备就用软件反复模考了。。。
12#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-13 12:06:12 | 只看该作者
顶啊!
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-13 12:06:26 | 只看该作者
14#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-13 12:06:41 | 只看该作者
up up up~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
15#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-13 12:11:16 | 只看该作者
求版主。。。。。求baby姐姐。。。求饭饭。。。。求各种。。。
16#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-5-13 12:11:42 | 只看该作者
顶啊顶。。。。事关SC做题速度的大事啊@@@@@
17#
发表于 2012-5-14 01:20:22 | 只看该作者
收到私信我就试着回答下,这种长划线的句子关键在于弄清主干。
27.(25957-!-item-!-188;#058&002223)


When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.


(A) When drafting the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, included in it by the author, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, was a call for female enfranchisement.
没有主句,fragments
(B) Including a call for female enfranchisement, a draft of the Declaration of Sentiments was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848 that Elizabeth Cady Stanton wrote.
including 悬挂修饰
(C) When the Declaration of Sentiments drafted by Elizabeth Cady Stanton was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Convention in 1848, a call for female enfranchisement had been included in it.
时态错误,改变句子含义,被动awkward,PS,代词指代不用太深究ambiguous问题,只需要确定1,先行词存在,2,单复数一致即可。
(D) A call for female enfranchisement, included in Elizabeth Cady Stanton's draft of the Declaration of Sentiments in 1848, that was adopted by the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention.
无动词,fragment
(E) When Elizabeth Cady Stanton drafted the Declaration of Sentiments that was adopted at the Seneca Falls Women's Rights Convention in 1848, she included in it a call for female enfranchisement.
正确答案是E没有异议,但是这个C啊除了完成时态的滥用,prep说这个it 指代很模糊 When A by B was adopted at C in 1848,  E for F had been included in it.  it前面这么多名词它指哪个啊。。。求解啊。。。
这个句子我觉得我觉得简化一下就成了When A was adopted in 1988, B had been included in it.请问这个简化是否正确?如果正确的话这个it 完全指向A木有很模糊啊。。。


P。S。代词在什么时候会出现指代歧义啊。。我这完全摸不着头绪,有时候一下就看出来了,有时候死活看不出。。。。
-- by 会员 秋晨小仔 (2012/5/13 10:52:57)

18#
发表于 2012-5-14 17:43:44 | 只看该作者
C选项的简化没有问题,When A by B was adopted at C in 1848,  E for F had been included in it.
不过it的指代确实是含糊的,是A还是C呢?
代词指代通常是看逻辑,但是也有两个规律,主从对位的话一般优先指代,就近的优先指代。如果是主从对位,那么明确是指代A,但这里不是主从对位,因此是就近指代,那么更像是指代C。但是逻辑上应该是指代A,所以就除了问题。
19#
发表于 2012-5-30 22:35:02 | 只看该作者
when A( declaration) was adopted at B(Convention),前面有两个n,后面的it就会觉得指代模糊了,而e答案里的it就很明确,因为,convention这个n在declaration的修饰成分里,所以it只能指代declaration,不存在模糊
20#
发表于 2012-5-30 23:09:53 | 只看该作者
我也有类似楼主的疑问,有些代词之前虽然有很多数一致可以指代的词,但是根据意思可以很明确判断指代的是哪一个,这是也算指代歧义吗?
同问啊~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-16 03:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部