LSAT-6-2-8(lawyer changes the titile)

albert

8.Some companies in fields were skilled employees are hard to find make signing an "agreement not to compete" a condition of employment. In such an agreement the employee promises not to go work for a competing firm for a set period after leaving his or her current employer. Courts are increasingly ruling that these agreements are not binding. Yet paradoxically, for people who signed such agreements when working for competing firms. Many firms are unwilling to consider bring them during the period covered by the agreement.
Which one of the following if true, most helps to resolve the paradox?
(A) Many companies will not risk having to become involved in lawsuits, even suits that they expect to have a favorable outcome.
(B) In some industries for example, the broadcast media, companies main source of new employees tends to be people who are already employed by competing firms
(C) Most companies that require their employees to sign agreements not to compete are aware that these documents are not legally binding
(D) Many people who have signed agreements not to compete are unwilling to renege on a promise by going to work for a competing firm
(E) Many companied consider their employees established relationships with clients and other people outside the company to be valuable company assets
ANSWER: A   我觉得C好象也对。
很多公司知道和约不合法，所以不让过去的雇员执行合同规定
谢谢！

mindfree

I think you misunderstood the passage. Many companies do no hire people during the period that are covered by these people's agreements with their former employers.

albert

oh..I got it...yes, I misunderstood the last sentence...
thank you, mindfree.

绿岛之旅

哪位大侠 可否再帮忙解释一下阿 我到现在还没哟弄明白 我选了c

哈佛情人

同楼上的，我也选C了。

既然说Agreement 不Binding,为什么说Companies还担心Involved In Lawsuits.

kingme

The only advice is re-read the question. This one is straightforward if you fully understand it.