Issue 60~~新鲜出炉，欢迎各种拍！！

greenfish7

60. Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals.


Political ideals are political objectives,political system and political life people are chasing. Should politician pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals? In my perspective, it is understandable that politicians present some elusive ideals that are hard to be analyzed quantitatively; nevertheless, the ideals of politicians are bound to fall on people who in essential support them.


Assuredly, it is reasonable for politicians to set some high political ideals that appeal to people. These ideals could attract people to support their ideas. However, people now have inevitable predisposition to suspect the genuine intentions of politicians’ elusive ideals, which could evade people’s scrutiny for its lack of lucidity. This results from the vagueness of the ideals to be analyzed quantitatively, and hence politicians have perennial explanatory power to circumvent the flaws of them. Such slogans as equality, justice, transparency, for instance, are elusive and people can exert no measure to check whether the politicians are indeed devoted in them.In contemporary society, media censures permeate every corner of the society,and thus people have more approaches to discover the deceptive nature under the elusive ideals. This also contributes to the problem of disbelief led by elusive ideals.

Thus, it is wise for politicians to pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. Firstly, the multitude are the core of the society, and correspondingly the core supporting power of the policies and ideas of the politicians; without people, the policies and ideas of politicians have nowhere to go and vanish into the air. Secondly, it ispoliticians’ duty to consult the opinion of people, for they impose prodigious taxation on them, and what they are supposed to advert is that once the anger of people reaches its culmination, the subverting power is threatening to their governance. Finally, consensus has its denotation of good eclecticism, in that it amalgamates the opinion of the majority and congregates more wits.

However, ideals are necessary to be set, in that more frequently people are not that perspicacious to perceive what politicians want to convey. People also need the slogans to assure themselves of the capabilityof the politicians they select and check whether they are actually creating welfare for people. Without ideals, the policies may decrease in its efficiency and effectiveness;without consensus, no one would support politicians and thus it cannot livelong.

On balance, it is understandable that ideals of politicians are difficult to be measured, however, politicians ought to make their behaviors transparent enough to convince their people. What’s more, politicians are better to set their ideals to fall on people and satisfy them as much aspossible.

greenfish7

我自己先拍吧。。逻辑不清。。很不清。。sigh~为难各位看官了。。我以前的提纲是这么写的：

1.    政治理想是人们关于未来政治制度、政治关系和政治生活等方面的预想。合理而实际的共同感是建立政治理想的基础，政客理应追求。这样的共同感符合集体利益collective interests，能够得到公众的支持，并且符合社会的发展趋势。
2.    但是，政治理想不能仅限于一些模糊的概念，难以给出一个量化的标准来衡量。比如公平、民主、透明等政治口号。这些口号如果不能使公众达到共同感和认同感，也只是一种遥远的政治理想而已。
3.    因此，政客们理应有一种崇高的政治理想，但是不能脱离实际，也不能过于模糊。

这篇写得太乱了。。再努力~

jameszhm

你好，每周三拍是官方选出来的，请不要自己设置在每周三拍区，建议放在求拍区。期待你继续加油，我们每周三拍会关注每一个求拍者的。祝好~