*** This argument is well presented yet far-fetched. It lays a claim that ... Nevertheless, the argument is in effect definitely unreasonable due to several flaws after a close scrutiny, albeit it may appear plausible at a cursory glance. First off, a threshold problem arises in this argument that ...However, this contention is open to a number of interpretations. ... We would never know if ...Hence, without accounting for and ruling out other likely scenarios, by no means could the author contend that ... Moreover, even though the author might be able to provide evidence for us to deduce a solution to the problem presented above afterwards, the argument still maintains ill-conceived. Another problem could be located that ... It may be ... but it's totally possible that ... To corroborate his point, the author should pay a close heed to as well as cope with the representative possibilities mentioned above. Only the evidence of ... is the key to bolstering his recommendation. Ultimately, even if the foregoing assumptions might turn out to be supported by ensuing evidence, a crucial problem remains that ... But this doesn't make sense since ... In this light, it's reasonable to cast doubts upon the author's presumption which I reject as inadequate, in that ... For instance, the author omits to inform us that ... Pursuing this line of reasoning, it proves to be the author's responsibility to mull over his assumption and then furnish it with cogent evidence so as to pave the way for a more tenable argument. In retrospect, it seems precipitous for the author to jump to the conclusion based on a series of problematic premises. To dismiss the specter of implausibility of his recommendation, the author ought to come to grips with all existing flaws, such as... After all, feckless attempts with a fallible method could be nothing but a fool's errand. Thus, only by grasping the gist of this argument could the author draw a convincible conclusion.