ISSUE6 国家是否应该统一课程 真心求拍

uniquechong

6：A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Writea response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

第二次写这篇文章了，嗯，感觉写的还是不好，求拍~真心求拍~

提纲：
正面观点：统一教材有其有利的一面；
1.1    在大学之前的教育着力于通识教育，国家统一课程规范学生掌握的知识和能力，有助于学生学习，保证学生社会竞争力。（个人）
1.2    国家统一教材可以使各个地区教学内容统一，保证教育的公平性。
2.    反：但是，这项计划的可行性并不高
2.1    并不是所有地方都有能力提供统一全面的课程（资源有限）
2.2    再多民族、多语言的国家，也是不容易实现的
3.    反面观点：但这样做也会有不利的一面；
3.1    对学生而言：这样可能会扼杀学生的学习兴趣
3.2    对国家而言：很多国家是多民族国家，不同地区都有各自的文化，每种文化都需要年轻一代去传承。统一课程没有顾忌到文化习俗的差异，势必会影响文化的多样性。




Should a nation require students to study the same national curriculum until they enter university? To answer this question, we need to analyze the issue comprehensively and systematically. In some sense, I agree with the speaker's assertion that nation should coerce the students to study the same national curriculum, but the statement fails to consider the inflexible and disadvantage of this policy.

Of course, there is no denying the fact the central curriculum would be beneficial in some respect. At the personal level, the same national curriculum can help students have a broad view of this world. Furthermore, the same central curriculum can transform young students from vastly different backgrounds into competent, upwardly mobile adults. At the national level, education is usually viewed as a tool for solving social problems especially social inequality. By adopting the policy which coerces the students to study the same national curriculum, the nation can guarantee that different regions have the same curriculum and the equality of the education can be ensured. Without the same central curriculum, the remote areas is likely to have a worse education because the local governments do not have enough money to design the comprehensively curriculum.

Despite the merits of the speaker's claim, however, the speaker's ignores the implement difficulty of this policy. There is no doubt that different areas exert the different prosperity and some regions is unable to afford enough money to provide the national curriculum. Moreover, it is difficult to realize this policy in some countries which have lots of languages and ethics.

Furthermore, there are some adverse results by taking this policy. At the personal level, the same national curriculum may kill the students intrinsic of study. In my opinion, the genuine purpose of education is rooted not in self-realization of the individual but rather bringing into action the potential in man aimed at helping them to lead a better, intellectual and spiritual life. The same national curriculum requires all the students to study the same things. Some students are probably to lose their interest and potential. For supporting examples one need look no further than the students around us. They feel ennui about the school and even are addicted to the computer games just because they are not interested in the same national curriculum they studied. At the national level, the central curriculum may harm the diversity of the cultures. Many countries contain variety nations and different nations have their different cultures. Of course, every culture needs the young people to study and inherit. There is no doubt that the national curriculum contains no courses about these cultures because the national curriculum is aimed at the whole students among the countries. So when we adopt this policy which require all the students around the country to study the same national curriculum, the diversity of the cultures is possible to be harmed.

In sum, the national curriculum is a double-edged sword. Of course, the national curriculum is able to assure the equality of education and help students be more confident about their futures. But we cannot ignore the importance of the provincial curriculum, which cater to the students' hobbies and can inherit the cultures. In my opinion, we should attach importance to the national curriculum at the same time should be allowed to set some provincial curriculum

uniquechong

我自己先顶一个吧~

竹林中人

只说说开头吧，其实这种开头虽然很普遍，但不可取，其实你自己也知道，很空，就像你问我一个问题，我说这个问题在一些方面对，另一方面不对，但我没指出具体什么方面。这样不好，不能吸引人，开头最好有点实质性的东西

uniquechong

好，谢谢，我会改的~我也觉得这样写很没意思·~

weiqu

2.1    并不是所有地方都有能力提供统一全面的课程（资源有限）

我觉得,如果按照这样的逻辑想想,既然使用广泛统一的课程都没有能力做到,那么以这种地区自己的师资力量和人力财力,能做出有可比性的课程么?

其次,多民族多语言的国家不实际.这个论据我个人觉得还不是特别实在.任何国家都有官方或者通用的语言.这种因为多名字多语言而不能普遍推广课程的,好像没有哦? 中国是多民族国家,我们大家义务教育也都学一样的课程没问题.