ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 9612|回复: 19
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og234与og237

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-24 06:16:00 | 只看该作者

og234与og237


234. The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters; infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength--0.1 millimeters--is too long to be registered by the eye.


(A)  infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength--0.1 millimeters--is too long to be registered by the eye


(B)   however, the wavelength of infrared radia­tion--0.1 millimeters--is top long to be registered by the eye making it invisible


(C)  infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength--0.1 millimeters--is too long for the eye to register it


(D)  however, because the wavelength of infrared radiation is 0.1 millimeters, it is too long for the eye to register and thus invisible


(E)   however, infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long for the eye to register, thus making it invisible


Choice E produces an illogical statement by using a restrictive clause introduced by that where a comma followed by the nonrestrictive "which" is required: a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long nonsensically suggests that not all wavelengths of 0.1 milli­meters are too long for the eye to register.



237. It seems likely that a number of astronomical phenomena, such as the formation of planetary nebulas, may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other at close range.


(A)  may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other


(B)  may be caused by the interaction between two stars that each orbit the other


(C)  are because of the interaction between two stars that orbit each other


(D)  are caused by the interaction of two stars where each is orbiting the other


(E)   are caused by the interaction of two stars orbiting each other


Choice C can be faulted because to form a passive construction, are should take a verb form such as caused rather than an adverb such as because. Also, the phrase two stars that orbit each other illogically suggests that there are two particular stars causing all the phenomena in question, rather than various sets of stars in various locations.



我怎么感觉234和237中的that,og给出的解释有矛盾呢,在234中是限定性到了237中成非限定性了?请nn指点,谢谢。

沙发
发表于 2004-8-24 07:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用我爱宝宝在2004-8-24 6:16:00的发言:


234. The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters; infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength--0.1 millimeters--is too long to be registered by the eye.



(A)  infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength--0.1 millimeters--is too long to be registered by the eye



(B)   however, the wavelength of infrared radia­tion--0.1 millimeters--is top long to be registered by the eye making it invisible



(C)  infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength--0.1 millimeters--is too long for the eye to register it



(D)  however, because the wavelength of infrared radiation is 0.1 millimeters, it is too long for the eye to register and thus invisible



(E)   however, infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long for the eye to register, thus making it invisible



Choice E produces an illogical statement by using a restrictive clause introduced by that where a comma followed by the nonrestrictive "which" is required: a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long nonsensically suggests that not all wavelengths of 0.1 milli­meters are too long for the eye to register.




237. It seems likely that a number of astronomical phenomena, such as the formation of planetary nebulas, may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other at close range.



(A)  may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other



(B)  may be caused by the interaction between two stars that each orbit the other



(C)  are because of the interaction between two stars that orbit each other



(D)  are caused by the interaction of two stars where each is orbiting the other



(E)   are caused by the interaction of two stars orbiting each other



Choice C can be faulted because to form a passive construction, are should take a verb form such as caused rather than an adverb such as because. Also, the phrase two stars that orbit each other illogically suggests that there are two particular stars causing all the phenomena in question, rather than various sets of stars in various locations.



我怎么感觉234和237中的that,og给出的解释有矛盾呢,在234中是限定性到了237中成非限定性了?请nn指点,谢谢。


两个意思都是要非限制性的.234说用", which"来代替that. 237指出that限定了就是那两个星星, 不是许多两两星星.

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-24 10:10:00 | 只看该作者

可是如果that是限制性的,那237里面的“现在分词修饰就是非限制性的了”,这个结论肯定是错的。

如果马鱼mm和og都是对的,那么结论就是that的限定修饰与现在分词的限定性修饰237E是有区别的?(怎么感觉说话象cr题)

请求nn帮助,谢谢。

地板
发表于 2004-8-24 11:09:00 | 只看该作者
不错,对于237的确有很多争议,记得paopao可能给ETS去过信,可以确认一下;另,LES在这个问题上给过一个参考,好像是:现分泛指,限定性定从特指。但是纵观你对这两道题的理解,偶认为你对限定和非限定的理解应该是正确的。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-24 11:23:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢版主确认。我确实认为237的解释出问题了,234是例证。

6#
发表于 2005-2-16 20:39:00 | 只看该作者
我怎么看来看去,234和237都说的是that引导的是restrictive从句呀?好像没有矛盾呀。请教。多谢!
7#
发表于 2005-5-5 20:38:00 | 只看该作者

嗯,OG解释得很正确,是统一的,没问题

8#
发表于 2005-7-19 22:55:00 | 只看该作者

同意楼上的

9#
发表于 2005-8-26 10:39:00 | 只看该作者

lz说得是237题的正确选项E中用了分词orbiting each other,但og 没有认为这个分词修饰是限定性的,所以产生了lz的疑问:是不是现分修饰是非限定性的??如果不是,那就是与that引导的限定行从句不同??


欧也疑惑了


nn们能再解答一下吗?

10#
发表于 2005-9-19 14:26:00 | 只看该作者
我也有疑惑
能請nn们解答一下吗?
謝謝!!!

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-19 14:31:23编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 02:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部