ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: lucre
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 7-26

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-4-11 23:04:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用LES在2004-9-16 13:56:00的发言:

“only if 要用虚拟”绝对是一个错误的概念!


在GMAT中,条件从句一般用一般现在时一般过去时


E优于C还有一个原因,主动优于被动。



To support LES' point, see OG 37


While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course.


(A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course


(B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course


(C) if it is taught only as a course required separately


(D) if it was taught only as a separate and required courseB


(E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately


Choice B is best: in sentences expressing a conditional result (x will happen if y happens), the verb of the main clause should be in the future tense and the verb of the if clause should be in the present indicative. Thus, is taught (in B) is consistent with will take, whereas would be taught (in A and E) and was taught (in D) are not. For clarity, only in C, D, and E should immediately precede the entire if clause that it is meant to modify.


Per the explanation, we can conclude that ETS view "Only if" as a "if" sentence; then, consider the position of "only"...


12#
发表于 2005-5-24 20:26:00 | 只看该作者

今天看看怎么C顺眼多了。


C怎么会顺眼呢?only if the output …… would be trimmed by a total of 500,000 barrels a day,trim是修剪降低削减的意思,翻译一下只有当产出每天被500,000桶石油削减……会有这种意思吧


A:前面已经有but表示转折了,还是不要的好;were to trim时态、用法都不够好


B:but;includes要用复数;is trimmed错


C:including短语修饰歧异;被动


D:includes要用复数;were trimming时态inconsistence


E:正确

13#
发表于 2005-6-10 05:45:00 | 只看该作者

A: "were to" in "if" clause expresses subjunctive mood. Thus A should be ruled out.


C: "would" cannot be used in "if" clause, which is said in OG.

14#
发表于 2005-6-14 01:25:00 | 只看该作者

C用被动可以排除。


但是看刚才的哥们说but only if 和only if还有用法上的区别?


指教。`~~

15#
发表于 2005-6-14 12:54:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用xiao_zhutou在2005-4-11 23:04:00的发言:



To support LES' point, see OG 37


While some academicians believe that business ethics should be integrated into every business course, others say that students will take ethics seriously only if it would be taught as a separately required course.



(A) only if it would be taught as a separately required course



(B) only if it is taught as a separate, required course



(C) if it is taught only as a course required separately



(D) if it was taught only as a separate and required courseB



(E) if it would only be taught as a required course, separately



Choice B is best: in sentences expressing a conditional result (x will happen if y happens), the verb of the main clause should be in the future tense and the verb of the if clause should be in the present indicative. Thus, is taught (in B) is consistent with will take, whereas would be taught (in A and E) and was taught (in D) are not. For clarity, only in C, D, and E should immediately precede the entire if clause that it is meant to modify.


Per the explanation, we can conclude that ETS view "Only if" as a "if" sentence; then, consider the position of "only"...



totally agree! if one uses this principle, he or she will pick out the right answer in 10 seconds.

16#
发表于 2005-6-14 20:49:00 | 只看该作者
条件句分为真实条件句和虚拟条件句, 楼上的例子是真实条件句, 还是要具体情况具体分析的.
17#
发表于 2005-7-23 19:41:00 | 只看该作者
问个很弱的问题,未划线部分的by不能看作被动的标志吗?请解惑
18#
发表于 2005-8-4 23:47:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ethyl在2005-5-24 20:26:00的发言:


C怎么会顺眼呢?only if the output …… would be trimmed by a total of 500,000 barrels a day,trim是修剪降低削减的意思,翻译一下只有当产出每天被500,000桶石油削减……会有这种意思吧


A:前面已经有but表示转折了,还是不要的好;were to trim时态、用法都不够好


B:but;includes要用复数;is trimmed错


C:including短语修饰歧异;被动


D:includes要用复数;were trimming时态inconsistence


E:正确


By 不仅仅有这个意思吧?

我记得,有这样的结构:动词+by+数词。举例来说吧:

Spending on the construction project will be reduced by 10%.  

为什么C不正确呢?

19#
发表于 2005-11-23 15:05:00 | 只看该作者
嗯..but..but only if两层转,都不知道第二个but是转折哪一个,所以一般不这样用
20#
发表于 2005-12-16 23:06:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用美林在2005-1-13 14:34:00的发言:

我觉得,C中的including Norway, Mexico, and Russia修饰了the output of non-OPEC nations,所以应该排除.


希望大家讨论


正确。因为这样核心词就变output了,读起来就让人感觉including跳跃去修饰output这个核心词。而且有主动的还是用主动吧,被动一般在没得选的情况下再用比较好。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-22 10:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部