ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3337|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[issue] 新g issue 10 求拍~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-1-26 23:33:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
10) Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.



Since life is a miracle and all is dependent on each other in the nature, it is reasonable for nations to pass laws to preserve wilderness areas. Admittedly, it is also important to develop economy since economic development is also an important part in the social development. Thus it will be the best if the two can be balanced.

Life is equal, and we human being is just a part of natural chain, however, the original vulnerable ecological balance is being destroyed by our greedy and ignorance. Under the humans' power, the ecological balance that the nature organized for several billion years has been broken. More and more species are in danger to become extinct since people's many behaviors which have detrimental for species such as deforestation, land reclamation, killing of animals... And among these behaviors which accelerate for species' dieing out, the most direct factor should be destroying species' habits.

People's behavior of deforestation, make species in the forest losing their habit, thus those species tend to become extinct. For instance, as tropical rain forests are disappearing gradually, animals living there are also gradually dieing out. People's behavior of something about the ocean such as land reclamation, which have been destroying wetlands, bringing about detrimental effects for the ocean's ecological balance. The matter of oil spill in gulf of Mexico, Japan's killing a large number of whales ignoring the international community's strong condemning... All these lead more and more species in the ocean to become extinct.

From the industry revolution, although people have a powerful strength to change the nature for economic development, what the following are various forms of pollution such as air pollution, water pollution,solid pollution and so on. All these bring a large detrimental effect to the earth where people depend on to live. And people are revenged by the nature: air pollution has a bad effect on people's health; the climate's always changing make people uncomfortable; the trend of submerged land as the sea level has been rising threatens people who live near those lands to give up their homes...

Admittedly, people are for economic development to do those behaviors which have negative effect to the nature, for example, someone killing animals for making large profits via the animals' furs, and economic development is an indispensable part of social development since material is the foundation, therefore it seems understandable to develop economy at the cost of destroying the nature. However, the cost of destroying the nature is also expansive which may require our lives in return. Thus the best way is to make a balance between them. For some areas where species are so rich that they are less likely to become extinct in the short run, while economic development there is so demanding that people there even cannot meet their basic need to eat, we can pay more attention to develop the economy other than preserving some wilderness areas where are not so important right now.

In conclusion, to some extent, it is reasonable for nations to pass laws to preserve wilderness areas, since it is because not only that people should not deprive any species' right to life, but people's life also depend on this vulnerable ecological balance. However, sometimes for urgent economic development, it is necessary to pay the cost of destroying the nature. And the best way is to make a balance between them, thus making the development be sustainable.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-1-27 05:56:29 | 只看该作者
这篇文章是说要不要把没有开发的地方保护起来?这样做的好处和坏处是什么?
这不是个要保护珍稀动物的题目。

我们不是要讲大道理,而是从细节上突破它的逻辑。就是从逻辑出发来分析题目,不要拿到题目就靠感觉写,那样很难拿四分。

作文的提高,就是每天坚持不断地到cd写。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-1-28 12:32:33 | 只看该作者
ok~ thx
地板
发表于 2012-1-28 22:46:40 | 只看该作者
I hate to be repetitive but I also think you strayed a bit much from the main topic...

When you write an essay go over and over the subject to make sure that you essay doesn't stray from it. When your done writing go back and look at the issue and see if your essay directly relates to the issue and answers the question therein.

"you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position."

But I think it was easy to stray since it was so close to a topic that you like to comment on.
5#
发表于 2012-1-28 22:54:10 | 只看该作者
notice: this issue wasn't meant to be about the past but rather what to do concerning these things in the future!
6#
发表于 2012-1-28 23:12:14 | 只看该作者
你写的好多。。。我做多写3 oo
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-27 18:33:27 | 只看该作者
THX~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-2 16:19
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部