以下是引用ethyl在2005-5-22 20:24:00的发言:A:那个插入语一样的东东确实很碍眼,但无伤大体;疑问:如果把between 1876 and 1904后置,会不会产生歧义,这个时间状语会修饰整个句子,本来如果仅仅放到construction后面的话好像就是说1876-1904的建设,但是方最后的话好像是在说1876年到1904年,对于公共卫生的关注导致了……的建设?(存疑) B:时态错 C:时态错;for serving不如to serve好;时间状语更怪,估计unidiomaitc D:There be错;leading to短语修饰有歧义;serving短语错 E:There be错;遗漏信息concerns about public health Concerns about public health led to the construction between 1876 and 1904 of three separate sewer systems to serve metropolitan Boston. - Concerns about public health led to the construction between 1876 and 1904 of three separate sewer systems to serve
- Concerns about public health have led to the construction of three separate sewer systems between 1876 and 1904 to serve
- Concerns about public health have led between 1876 and 1904 to the construction of three separate sewer systems for serving
- There were concerns about public health leading to the construction between 1876 and 1904 of three separate sewer systems serving
- There were concerns leading between 1876 and 1904 to the construction of three separate sewer systems for serving
D:There be错;leading to短语修饰有歧义;serving短语错 ; 请问上面所说的leading to短语修饰有歧义是因为leading有可能修饰concerns , 也有可能修饰public health吗?? 可是 public health 前面有一个介词about ,中心词应该是concerns 啊,单就这个知识点来说,leading到底有没有歧义呢?? |