1. In the original book, it is said " you may use any of there pronouns as adjective in front of nouns", not "you must use them in front of nouns". When you use "that" or "those" to refer some noun or nouns, you must modify this new copy or copies, just as you did in your counter example. 2. In your example, "namely" is modifying the whole appositive, not the noun. 3. I am not sure where you find this. In Manhattan SC, the author only emphasizes that "The helping verbs would and should should NEVER go in the if part of the sentence". 4. Please tell me the specific page on which “likelihood/possibility“ is discussed. 5. In colloquial sentences, we usually use "be to" to express a future action. In GMAT, you must use "will" or "should" instead. 6. The subjective clause introduced by "that” is correct in GMAT. The frequently used structure is "it can hardly be said that…..", in which "that…" is the really subject but put in a revert position. In this option, the clause preceded by "that…" is put in the original position as the subject, but what is "it is their fault". This sentence is in passive voice, and it doesn't need an object any more. 7. As I haven't worked on Prep yet, please allow me to skip this. However, I haven't noticed "ones can't not refer to people". -- by 会员 alancui (2011/12/27 22:47:26)
非常感谢!豁然开朗 第1 2 4 5 6题我明白了,但是还有个疑问 第3:您的意思是不是说would/should 不能出现在if条件句中的 if从句 部分? |