AA132 求思路

dan0909

Our HuggyBunny brand is the bestselling brand of children’s clothing. Parents everywhere recognize the HuggyBunny logo as a mark of quality， and most of our customers show great brand loyalty. Sales reports have shown that parents are more likely to buy children’s clothes with the familiar HuggyBunny brand and logo than otherwise identical clothes without it. Therefore， if we use the HuggyBunny brand name and logo for the new line of clothing for teenagers that our company will soon be introducing， that clothing will sell better than it would if we labeled it with a new brand name and logo.

这道题我是这么分析的
-结论 Therefore， if we use the HuggyBunny brand name and logo for the new line of clothing for teenagers that our company will soon be introducing， that clothing will sell better than it would if we labeled it with a new brand name and logo.

refutation
-bestselling不一定因为recognize the logo, 可能因为价格低廉或者儿童（或家长）认同衣服的设计和外观
-sales reports是否有代表性
-all things are the same fallacy, 即便children clothing卖的好是因为客户对logo的认可，那么不能推导出对另一个群体teenage有一样的号召力

顺序上我先攻击all things are the same fallacy。
然后说sales report由于种种原因，未必representative
然后假定就算这能让消费者更认同这个产品也愿意因为品牌去买这个产品，也不能代表销量就会有提高，因为价格或销量等因素也会影响销量，品牌很可能只是很小的影响因素。

大家帮我看看有没有漏掉主要逻辑错误或者更好的攻击方法？

谢谢~