ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places have been cited by a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, which estimated that they did not count 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2689|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教!08prep1-251

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-10-17 10:43:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
251.(GWD-1-Q29)
Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places have been cited by a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, which estimated that they did not count 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast.

A.Faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places have been cited by a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, which estimated that they did not count 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast.

B.Citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, a new study of the 2000 United States presidential election has estimated that 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast were not counted.

C.Citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes cast were not counted in the 2000 United States presidential election, a new study estimates.

D.A new study has cited faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places in estimating that 4 million to 6 million of the 100 million votes that were cast had not been counted in the 2000 United States presidential election.(B)

E.A new study of the 2000 United States presidential election, citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places, has estimated 4 million to 6 million votes had not been counted of the 100 million votes cast.

答案是B,但是我对B有点疑问。。。B中citing...,a new study has...是否会被理解成先是有estimate(因为完成时),再有citing(因为省略了原来表示时间的词语???),所以表达的意思不对呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-10-17 12:27:52 | 只看该作者
Citing faulty voting equipment, confusing ballots, voter error, and problems at polling places是修饰 a new study的,不存在省略,而且estimate那是主句,你这个只是一个修饰,没那么多的时间关系,想多了貌似。。。。
板凳
发表于 2011-10-17 12:30:45 | 只看该作者
倒也不会,这个citing更像是一个【放在句首的V-ing做形容词修饰句首名词】。

这道题和OG12 Q25感觉比较像~楼主可以借鉴一下~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-10-17 16:49:41 | 只看该作者
HAHA,THANK YOU!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-12 14:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部