9. Astronomers at the Palomar Observatory have discovered a distant supernova explosion, one that they believe is a type previously unknown to science. (A) that they believe is (B) that they believe it to be (C) they believe that it is of (D) they believe that is (E) they believe to be of 又把这题翻出来了。^_^
In OG,. Finally, A, B, and D lack of and so illogically equate this particular explosion with the whole class of explosions to which it belongs: it is not a type but possibly one of a type.
One of a type, it sounds ok to me but don't know the official rule about one of a type, one of a kind, or ... we can't say one of a chair, right?
For this particular question, can we say "..... explosion, one type previously unknown to science?"
In OG,. Finally, A, B, and D lack of and so illogically equate this particular explosion with the whole class of explosions to which it belongs: it is not a type but possibly one of a type.
One of a type, it sounds ok to me but don't know the official rule about one of a type, one of a kind, or ... we can't say one of a chair, right?
For this particular question, can we say "..... explosion, one type previously unknown to science?" 我认为这种说法没有避免原先的错误,explosion不等于one type,而仅仅是type中的一个。
这个句子中的type的范畴比较广,举个例子,我们可以将武器设备看成一个type,而战斗机仅仅是这个type中的一个组成部分;再比如我们可以把化妆品看成一个type,而香水仅仅是one of this type。