ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 16014|回复: 16
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求证:GWD-12-41

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-12 14:17:00 | 只看该作者

求证:GWD-12-41

Q41:


The first English settlers to establish a permanent colony in America did it not at Plymouth but along the shore of the James River west of Chesapeake Bay.







  1. it not at Plymouth but


  2. so not at Plymouth but

  3. not at Plymouth but instead

  4. not at Plymouth but did so

  5. it not at Plymouth but rather

选B而不选A,是不是因为:establish是不定式结构修饰settler,did没法指代establish。所以用so指代to establish a permanent colony吗?


沙发
发表于 2004-7-12 14:29:00 | 只看该作者

是didi it的用法错。请参考OG41和215题。

板凳
发表于 2004-7-12 14:31:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ReedSong在2004-7-12 14:17:00的发言:

Q41:


The first English settlers to establish a permanent colony in America did it not at Plymouth but along the shore of the James River west of Chesapeake Bay.







  1. it not at Plymouth but


  2. so not at Plymouth but

  3. not at Plymouth but instead

  4. not at Plymouth but did so

  5. it not at Plymouth but rather

选B而不选A,是不是因为:establish是不定式结构修饰settler,did没法指代establish。所以用so指代to establish a permanent colony吗?


从句意上看来,so 是指to establish a permanent colony, 另外我还觉得有at..和along..的平行

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-19 18:25:00 | 只看该作者
多谢两位指点!
5#
发表于 2004-10-13 07:51:00 | 只看该作者

it is not the q41 of No.13 of GWD, the link must be wrong.

6#
发表于 2005-2-8 07:38:00 | 只看该作者
GWD-12-41
7#
发表于 2006-12-29 17:55:00 | 只看该作者
那有没有可能did指代establish然后it指代colony啊
8#
发表于 2007-1-16 10:56:00 | 只看该作者

C为何错啊

9#
发表于 2007-8-9 15:58:00 | 只看该作者

UP同问,有NN给解释一下吗?

10#
发表于 2007-8-9 21:11:00 | 只看该作者
c的话没宾语了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 13:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部