ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1858|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og12-74 即 og11-62 时态的疑问

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-9-10 11:15:53 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amout of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Greak Lakes.

(A) reduced the amout of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump
(B) reduced the phosphate amout  that municipalities had been dumping
(C) reduced the phosphate amout  municipalities have been allowed to dump
(D) reduced the amout of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump
(E) reduced the amout of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

这道题选D
我对og的解释有疑惑:
An agreement that occurred in 1972 is correctly described with the past tense verb reduced .Since the dumping continued after the date of the agreement ,the past perfect verb had been allowed should instead be the present are allowed (if the agreement remained in effect when the sentence was written ).

那么,既然the dumping continued,同时这个agreement remained in effect when the sentence was written , 为什么就一定要用过去式reduced而不用一般现在时来表示agreement的内容?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-9-10 12:55:49 | 只看该作者
municipalities are allowed to... 可以理解为客观事实吧。agreement是in 1972,过去时间,有时间标志词的不用想太多
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-9-10 14:04:18 | 只看该作者
谢谢~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 10:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部