At the turn of the twentieth century, forest covering as much as 90 percent of Thailand and accommodating as many as 300,000 elephants, a third of them domesticated and performing various essential tasks.
A.covering as much as 90 percent of Thailand and accommodating as many as 300,000 elephants, a third of them
B.covering as much as 90 percent of Thailand accommodated as much as 300,000 elephants, and a third of them were
C.covered as much as 90 percent of Thailand and accommodated as much as 300,000 elephants, with a third
D.covered as much as 90 percent of Thailand and accommodated as many as 300,000 elephants, a third of them
E.covered as much as 90 percent of Thailand and accommodating as many as 300,000 elephants, with a third of them 看过一些贴子,大家认为with可能会引起歧义,因为with可能修饰forest但我认为并不存在这样的歧义,因为尽管语法上存在这样的歧义,但是逻辑上就能消除这样的歧义,因为forest不可能domesticated and performing various essential tasks,所以逻辑上立马能消除语法带来的歧义,因此我认为并不存在这样的歧义。 本人看法: with短语作为定语修饰前面的300,000 elephants,但问题是不知道是a third= 300,000 elephants? 还是300,000里的三分之一?引起语义上的歧义,本人看法,望牛牛们拍砖 |