ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 心晴
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og 110

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2005-6-6 23:10:00 | 只看该作者

就是呀!照OG的解释,那么the cost of meeting environmental regulations to the United States petroleum industry 岂不更好?


12#
发表于 2005-6-7 00:06:00 | 只看该作者

up


我有不懂為什麼the cost of可以插入to the United States petroleum industry


還有我覺得A挺好的


不對的原因在於被動嗎??

13#
发表于 2005-6-7 09:25:00 | 只看该作者
14#
发表于 2005-7-30 16:26:00 | 只看该作者
up
15#
发表于 2005-11-13 21:54:00 | 只看该作者

110. It has been estimated that the annual cost to the LACE>United StatesLACE> of illiteracy in lost industrial output and tax revenues is at least $20 billion a year.



(A)            the annual cost to the LACE>United StatesLACE> of illiteracy in lost industrial output and tax revenues is at least $20 billion a year



(B)            the annual cost of illiteracy to the LACE>United StatesLACE> is at least $20 billion a year because of lost industrial output and tax revenues



(C)            illiteracy costs the LACE>United StatesLACE> at least $20 billion a year in lost industrial output and tax revenues



(D)            $20 billion a year in lost industrial output and tax revenues is the annual cost to the LACE>United StatesLACE> of illiteracy



(E)lost industrial output and tax revenues cost the United States at least $20 billion a year because of illiteracy



In choices A, B, and D, the combined use of annual and a year is redundant. Choices A, D, and E are awkward and confused because other constructions intrude within the phrase cost... of illiteracy: for greatest clarity, cost should be followed immediately by a phrase (e.g., of illiteracy ) that identifies the nature of the cost. Choice E is particularly garbled in reversing cause and effect, saying that it is lost output and revenues rather than illiteracy that costs the United States over $20 billion a year. Choice B is wordy and awkward, and idiom requires in rather than because of to introduce a phrase identifying the constituents of the $20 billion loss. Concise, logically worded, and idiomatic, choice C is best.



请问上面黄色部分是什么意思?哪位帮忙解释一下?谢谢!

16#
发表于 2006-1-23 17:28:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用mmfoolish在2005-11-13 21:54:00的发言:

110. It has been estimated that the annual cost to the LACE>United StatesLACE> of illiteracy in lost industrial output and tax revenues is at least $20 billion a year.



(A)            the annual cost to the LACE>United StatesLACE> of illiteracy in lost industrial output and tax revenues is at least $20 billion a year



(B)            the annual cost of illiteracy to the LACE>United StatesLACE> is at least $20 billion a year because of lost industrial output and tax revenues



(C)            illiteracy costs the LACE>United StatesLACE> at least $20 billion a year in lost industrial output and tax revenues



(D)            $20 billion a year in lost industrial output and tax revenues is the annual cost to the LACE>United StatesLACE> of illiteracy



(E)lost industrial output and tax revenues cost the United States at least $20 billion a year because of illiteracy



In choices A, B, and D, the combined use of annual and a year is redundant. Choices A, D, and E are awkward and confused because other constructions intrude within the phrase cost... of illiteracy: for greatest clarity, cost should be followed immediately by a phrase (e.g., of illiteracy ) that identifies the nature of the cost. Choice E is particularly garbled in reversing cause and effect, saying that it is lost output and revenues rather than illiteracy that costs the United States over $20 billion a year. Choice B is wordy and awkward, and idiom requires in rather than because of to introduce a phrase identifying the constituents of the $20 billion loss. Concise, logically worded, and idiomatic, choice C is best.



请问上面黄色部分是什么意思?哪位帮忙解释一下?谢谢!


选项a,d,e是笨拙而混乱的因为在cost和 of illiteracy加入了其他成分:为达到清晰最大化的目的,cost后面应立即跟着一个词组(比如of illiteracy)来鉴别cost的性质

17#
发表于 2006-6-22 14:04:00 | 只看该作者

想请问一下COST得用法!

不知道cost to 还是 cost of 更好。 谢谢

18#
发表于 2006-10-13 15:48:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用looook在2004-10-30 7:54:00的发言:

cost of sth 和cost to sb都有这样的用法,对于本题,cost to sb of sth OG里说不对了,那么B选项中cost of sth to sb对吗?

對 解釋裡面說的of誰要立即放在cost後面 不然會有歧異

就像是AD-->會讓人以為是文盲的美國

19#
发表于 2007-10-30 17:21:00 | 只看该作者

请问一下,是不是在句中随意加上关系连词,如because 或because of 等,会改变句子的原意呢?

如本题的B/E,而OG中的解释也说E是"distorts meaning".

请教NN啊

20#
发表于 2007-10-31 18:07:00 | 只看该作者

自己顶一下,请牛牛解答啊!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 15:58
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部