dude, CMU is the way to go. CMU prevails when it comes to job prospects. if you don't like programming, suck it up for 16 months and get a S&T gig and your all set. -- by 会员 小佳 (2011/4/15 10:58:31)
yes, but MIT has a bigger name which provide long-long benefit. -- by 会员 evan1119 (2011/4/15 14:48:06)
the thing is, after securing your first job, school name will be playing a smaller and smaller role in your career advancement. ask yourself would you prefer to: (1) start in S&T at DB/Citi/GS etc after graduation and build up a career there, or (2) enjoy a "long-run benefit" while struggle to even land your first job think about it man, and don't forget you could always get an MBA to re-brand yourself. Regards, -- by 会员 小佳 (2011/4/15 15:03:46)
Thanks for the constructive advice, very helpful.I am a fresh graduate with limited internship experience in IBD in China (not doing much). Considering my interest is in S&T and hedge funds CMU will definitely be a better choice. But programming is really a challenge. CMU might lead to a programming intensive career, which is not in my favor. I think my background is strong in Finance and Econ, relatively weak in Math, and extremely poor in programming. In future job searching I believe apart from which program you take, it will also depends on how well you do in the program. I am more confident with my performance under MIT's curriculum. Also, I did not get scholarship from CMU while many of those who got admitted also received $21K. If I got the scholarship I might tend to take CMU but now the cost of the two program is almost the same. -- by 会员 evan1119 (2011/4/16 15:48:33)
|