ChaseDream
搜索
1234
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: evan1119
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[录取汇报] 求建议MIT MFIN VS CMU MSCF

[复制链接]
31#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-16 15:48:33 | 只看该作者
dude, CMU is the way to go. CMU prevails when it comes to job prospects.

if you don't like programming, suck it up for 16 months and get a S&T gig and your all set.
-- by 会员 小佳 (2011/4/15 10:58:31)



yes, but MIT has a bigger name which provide long-long benefit.
-- by 会员 evan1119 (2011/4/15 14:48:06)




the thing is, after securing your first job, school name will be playing a smaller and smaller role in your career advancement. ask yourself would you prefer to:
(1) start in S&T at DB/Citi/GS etc after graduation and build up a career there, or
(2) enjoy a "long-run benefit" while struggle to even land your first job

think about it man, and don't forget you could always get an MBA to re-brand yourself.

Regards,
-- by 会员 小佳 (2011/4/15 15:03:46)


Thanks for the constructive advice, very helpful.I am a fresh graduate with limited internship experience in IBD in China (not doing much). Considering my interest is in S&T and hedge funds CMU will definitely be a better choice.
But programming is really a challenge. CMU might lead to a programming intensive career, which is not in my favor. I think my background is strong in Finance and Econ, relatively weak in Math, and extremely poor in programming. In future job searching I believe apart from which program you take, it will also depends on how well you do in the program. I am more confident with my performance under MIT's curriculum.
Also, I did not get scholarship from CMU while many of those who got admitted also received $21K. If I got the scholarship I might tend to take CMU but now the cost of the two program is almost the same.
32#
发表于 2011-4-16 16:45:13 | 只看该作者
dude, CMU is the way to go. CMU prevails when it comes to job prospects.

if you don't like programming, suck it up for 16 months and get a S&T gig and your all set.
-- by 会员 小佳 (2011/4/15 10:58:31)









yes, but MIT has a bigger name which provide long-long benefit.
-- by 会员 evan1119 (2011/4/15 14:48:06)










the thing is, after securing your first job, school name will be playing a smaller and smaller role in your career advancement. ask yourself would you prefer to:
(1) start in S&T at DB/Citi/GS etc after graduation and build up a career there, or
(2) enjoy a "long-run benefit" while struggle to even land your first job

think about it man, and don't forget you could always get an MBA to re-brand yourself.

Regards,
-- by 会员 小佳 (2011/4/15 15:03:46)








Thanks for the constructive advice, very helpful.I am a fresh graduate with limited internship experience in IBD in China (not doing much). Considering my interest is in S&T and hedge funds CMU will definitely be a better choice.
But programming is really a challenge. CMU might lead to a programming intensive career, which is not in my favor. I think my background is strong in Finance and Econ, relatively weak in Math, and extremely poor in programming. In future job searching I believe apart from which program you take, it will also depends on how well you do in the program. I am more confident with my performance under MIT's curriculum.
Also, I did not get scholarship from CMU while many of those who got admitted also received $21K. If I got the scholarship I might tend to take CMU but now the cost of the two program is almost the same.
-- by 会员 evan1119 (2011/4/16 15:48:33)






33#
发表于 2011-4-16 18:04:49 | 只看该作者
^exactly

progamming - no worries, only 16 months of programming at CMU is not that bad if you could land a non-quant S/T gig afterwards

21k difference - again pretty negligible at this stage, you're essentially choosing among career paths, not schools
34#
发表于 2011-4-16 18:37:10 | 只看该作者
agree~
35#
发表于 2011-4-17 09:50:29 | 只看该作者
看牛牛的讨论受益匪浅~~~
36#
发表于 2011-4-17 14:03:43 | 只看该作者
Hey I went to school today based on what I heard from both program director and most current student, CMU placed maybe more than 50% on sales/trade 30 on risk management and the rest are asset management/others
I think it will be a good fit for you!
37#
发表于 2011-5-24 22:00:09 | 只看该作者
30% on risk management doesn't sound good to me. I wouldn't be doing database-crunching having studied a professional-oriented master. Of course, unless you are interested in Risk Management from beginning.

As I said, the only benefit of going to CMU is doing an internship. However, you need to spend 16m months instead of 12 months at MIT.

With MIT, you are pretty open to any field of finance. CMU limite your choices to quant and trading roles. I want to emphasize that trading roles do not require heavy programming skills like CMU will be forcing on you.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-5 04:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部