求助OG10 SC109 require用法

angela0711

109. Legislation in the Canadian province of Ontario requires of both public and private employers that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are usually held by men.
(A)    that pay be the same for jobs historically held by women as for jobs requiring comparable skill that are
(B)    that pay for jobs historically held by women should be the same as for a job requiring comparable skills
(C)    to pay the same in jobs historically held by women as in jobs of comparable skill that are
(D)    to pay the same regardless of whether a job was historically held by women or is one demanding comparable skills
(E)    to pay as much for jobs historically held by women as for a job demanding comparable skills





请问大家都是用排除法做的吗？单看A选项，对句子的结构很困惑啊

Choice A is best. In choice B, should is illogical after requires, or at least unnecessary, and so is better omitted; in choices B and E, job does not agree in number with jobs; and in choices B, D, and E, the wording illogically describes the comparable skills rather than the jobs as being "usually held by men." Choices C, D, and E produce the ungrammatical construction requires of... employers to pay, in which of makes the phrase incorrect. In C, the use of in rather than for is unidiomatic, and jobs of comparable skill confusedly suggests that the jobs rather than the workers possess the skills. In D, the phrase beginning regardless ... is awkward and wordy in addition to being illogical.

aeoluseros

please specify your quesiton, thanks. actually, I think OG has already given us enough explanation.

yoline8219

我也觉得这道题特别困惑，我查了一下require 的用法： 一个是require sb to do, 一个是 require that sb (should ) do.

这里 should 可以省略，就可以sb/sth后面直接加原型。

但是这里加入了of both public and private employees.所以我觉得这些of........都是修饰 pay的。

主干就是 legislation requires pay (of.........) be the same for jobs....as for jobs.....


不知道有没有说清楚，望nn解答。

yoline8219

我也觉得这道题特别困惑，我查了一下require 的用法： 一个是require sb to do, 一个是 require that sb (should ) do.

这里 should 可以省略，就可以sb/sth后面直接加原型。

但是这里加入了of both public and private employees.所以我觉得这些of........都是修饰 pay的。

主干就是 legislation requires pay (of.........) be the same for jobs....as for jobs.....



不好意思，legislation requires that pay (of.........) be the same for jobs....as for jobs.....




不知道有没有说清楚，望nn解答。

-- by 会员 yoline8219 (2011/10/8 22:03:27)