ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1794|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

马上四月二十三日要考试了,求朋友们修改作文

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-3 22:20:38 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
不得不说,现在写作文还是有些超时的,要达到四十分钟了,希望各位能够多多给予指导,谢谢
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The government should put more money on Internet access rather than public transportation. Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Currently, it is undeniable that the investing directions and the developing policy made by the government do make sense in the process of a country's stepping into being prosperity and well-developed. Therefore, when it comes to the issue whether put more money on Internet access or public transportation, opinions may be highly divided. Actually, I concede that the idea of some individuals to spend more money on public transportation may, to some extent, be theoretical for its tight connection with people's daily lives; however, there are principal reasons for agreeing to the statement to put more money on Internet access rather than transit system.

First and the most important, it is self-evident that Internet access plays a critical role in the outcome of the development of a country--that is, many sections that make the state proved to be well-developed do not have nothing to do with Internet access. Compelling justifications can be made in the case that we may evaluate the living standard of the citizens of a country through their consuming, the improvement of the industrialization, or the convenience of the transit system. And it is assailable to identify them with the capability of the Internet access. Apparently, modern society is a world that is inundated with the advanced, high technology, a world that is full of "wired", and a world that is continuing to do so in a foreseeable future. Public transportation is just one of the above evaluation standards, and to enable the transit system to be strong enough to service people, the capacity of the Internet access may be taken into consideration.

Further, there is no doubt that it is convenient to people to get their daily goods through the Internet high way. Granted, the highly-developed public transportation makes it easier for everyday lives, such as the availability to something to eat, the new, fashioned clothes, and merchandise for daily lives. Nevertheless, it is also available to make use of the terms above through Internet. Additionally, Internet access can provide multiple fields that transportation can not touch, which can be illustrated with the multi-channel for the latest information and the communication with friends or co-workers without making long drive to the city center. Obviously, putting more money on Internet access takes far more advantage than investing on public transit.

Admittedly, even though there exits some factors linked to public transportation or other aspects that cannot be resolved by Internet, and adolescents' addicted to Internet has been a long-time problem in educating teenagers, making Internet access as the project to be investable still makes sense. Evidently, to identify dozens of aspects that are matched with the prosperity of a country to be connected with the Internet, the investing must be a project for the future. At the same time, with the deeply-developing outcome run out as the sea, these problems will be eliminated and the value of putting more money on public transportation will be visible.

Overall, despite some minor disadvantages linked with the investing on Internet access, convincing illustrations such as the dedication to many aspects of the evaluating standard of the productivity of a country, and obvious capability compared to the public transportation really persuade people into the statement that putting more money on Internet access than transit system.

Do you think it is reasonable that professional athletes such as basketball and soccer players earn so much money? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
When it comes to the issue whether professional athletes such as basketball and soccer players deserve such high salaries, opinions tend to be divided. Some individuals argue that sportspeople cannot earn substantial sums of money since few things concrete have been made by them. However, others may oppose to the former views. And there are principle reasons for agreeing to the statement that it is reasonable for athletes to be highly paid.

Despite the extremely substantial base of world population, few would deny that people who are athletically gifted are rare. For example, preeminent players such as Griffin and Kevin Garnett have reached a level that humble people cannot be trained to be comparable. In addition to the rarity talent, whether they demand multi-million dollars is dependent on their achivements and popularity in the chosen profession. Inevitably, many sportspeople have been involved in strict training with minimum leisure time, mostly from their childhood onward, coping with injury both of physical and psychological. It can be illustrated with the case that Deshler, the former elite star of Bayern Munich, had to end up his career as a football player with suffering from high depression at an early age. As a consequence, top sports performers deserve abundant paid due to their non-replicable talent and constant dedication to make their profession to the top.

Further, not only do these distinguished athletes have impact on their roster, but influence a city, even a field as well. Compelling justifications can be made that merchandising revenue, tickets sales, and the attraction of a city do not have anything to do with the top sportspeople there. Besides, it is self-evident to that the championship and honor brought by the players, the behavior of the big names' as a role model, and even the spirit for pursuing tenacity and success have all been a landscape. Based on these arguments, preeminent athletes' being paid dearly really makes sense.

Granted, it may be true that a few sportspeople earn money that has gotten out of hand. Nevertheless, if highly paid players translate their large share of money into sponsorships or helping people of a lower living standard, it's apparent that they deserve the first-rate wages. Also, athletes that are highly paid are relatively rare, i.e. salaries of most of them are comparatively modest. Likewise, though I concede that some sports are involved in assaulting fans, swearing at coaches, or intimidating families, that is, people generally act like animals, the devotion and impact as a role model take far more advantages.

Having considered all the arguments above, in spite of some disappointing facts, elite sports players do deserve premium rate salaries owing to their unique gift, dedication as public figures as well as the amazing influence on a city, or even the sports field.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-13 15:47:58 | 只看该作者
这多少字数啊?作文要求的多少啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-2 09:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部