又是一个老话题 HKUST vs. CEIBS

grossman

CEIBS在中国就业更合适。两个学校的水平和师资差不多。到网上查查就了解了。

-- by 会员 星星点灯2010 (2011/4/19 20:35:32)

You must be kidding. HKUST is much stronger in terms of its faculty. CEIBS faculty has very low reputation globally except a few outliers. CEIBS has recently improved with the hiring of Huang Ming, Chiang Jeongwen from CKGSB but it is still much worse thatn HKUST.

Chang Chun and Chen Hong from CEIBS have all moved to SAIF. The remaining well know faculties are Katherine Xin of OB and Xu Bin of economics.

flyeoc

CEIBS在中国就业更合适。两个学校的水平和师资差不多。到网上查查就了解了。

-- by 会员 星星点灯2010 (2011/4/19 20:35:32)

You must be kidding. HKUST is much stronger in terms of its faculty. CEIBS faculty has very low reputation globally except a few outliers. CEIBS has recently improved with the hiring of Huang Ming, Chiang Jeongwen from CKGSB but it is still much worse thatn HKUST.

Chang Chun and Chen Hong from CEIBS have all moved to SAIF. The remaining well know faculties are Katherine Xin of OB and Xu Bin of economics.

-- by 会员 grossman (2011/4/19 21:20:50)

中欧没好教授？那这几年咋发展起来的啊

fengxiaoma

教授好有个P用，学校和大公司的关系以及校友网络才是王道。如果以后想在大陆工作，中欧；如果以后想在香港工作，UST。中欧在大陆的影响力和关系完胜UST，当然在香港UST强中欧好几条街。

grossman

那不对吧. 你把Harvard Professor 和北大的教授互换， 没人去Harvard了， 大家都去北大

prayer

那不对吧. 你把Harvard Professor 和北大的教授互换， 没人去Harvard了， 大家都去北大

-- by 会员 grossman (2011/4/19 22:08:29)

校长不换，体制不变，还是要去harvard不去北大

leon53

HKUST从哪个方面都会优过CEIBS吧，哈哈，不好比的，目前还不是在一个层次的。

飘风

HKUST的科研实力是挺强的，不过ＭＢＡ的就业率一直很一般，09级的毕业后3个月就业率只有69%，Carrer report也很粗糙：https://mbacareer.ust.hk/web/recruiters/Employment_highlight_2010.pdf

leon53

HKUST的科研实力是挺强的，不过ＭＢＡ的就业率一直很一般，09级的毕业后3个月就业率只有69%，Carrer report也很粗糙：https://mbacareer.ust.hk/web/recruiters/Employment_highlight_2010.pdf

-- by 会员 飘风 (2011/4/20 13:44:05)

嗯，果然，前辈说CK和HKUST一个风格，蛮真实的。

星星点灯2010

大家查一查HKUST和CEIBS的教授背景就知道两家其实差不多。不知HKUST比ＣＥＩＢＳ强的信息从何而来，排名吗？

financial times的排名有时很古怪。印度管理学院第一次上榜，就排第十一。有人去读吗？

hang13

就业是王道，其他都是扯淡