以下是引用renprince在2004-5-27 23:56:00的发言：
1. The Wallerstein study indicates that even after a decade young men and women still experience some of the effects of a divorce occurring when a child.
- occurring when a child
- occurring when children
- that occurred when a child
- that occurred when they were children
- that has occurred as each was a child
Choice D is best. The phrasing a divorce that occurred when they were children correctly uses the relative clause that occurred to modify a divorce and includes a pronoun and verb (they were) that refer unambiguously to their antecedent, men and women. Choice A incorrectly introduces the when... phrase with occurring, thus illogically making divorce the grammatical referent of when a child; furthermore, the singular child does not agree with the plural men and women. B replaces child with children but otherwise fails to correct A's errors of structure and logic, and C corrects only the error created by occurring. Choice E includes an incorrect verb tense (has occurred) and wrongly replaces when with as. Also, each was does not properly refer to men and women.
不明白其中as 和when的区别
我觉得as有表“随着...”是过程性的。when就没这个意思. 参看:
84. One legacy of Madison Avenue’s recent campaign to appeal to people fifty years old and over is the realization that as a person ages, their concerns change as well.
(A) the realization that as a person ages, their
(B) the realization that as people age, their
(C) to realize that when a person ages, his or her
(D) to realize that when people age, their（B）
(E) realizing that as people age, their
25. The end of the eighteenth century saw the emergence of prize-stock breeding, with individual bulls and cows receiving awards, fetching unprecedented prices, and excited enormous interest whenever they were put on show.
- excited
- it excited
- exciting
- would excite
E. it had excited
Choice C is best. The third verb phrase in the series describing bulls and cows should have the same grammatical form as the first two. Only choice C has a present participle (or "-ing" form) that is parallel with the two preceding verbs, receiving and fetching. Instead of the present participle, choices A and B use the past tense (excited), choice D uses an auxiliary verb (would excite),（什么叫做auxiliary verb）----助动词呀 and choice E uses the past perfect tense (had excited). Additionally, the incorrect verb tenses in B and E are introduced by a pronoun, it, that lacks a logical noun referent.
171. In 1527 King Henry VIII sought to have his marriage to Queen Catherine annulled so as to marry Anne Boleyn.
- so as to marry
- and so could be married to
- to be married to
- so that he could marry
- in order that he would marry
The sentence calls for an adverbial clause of purpose to explain why Henry sought the annulment. D, the best choice, does this clearly and correctly. It is introduced by an appropriate conjunction, so that, and contains a logically appropriate verb form, could marry. Awkward and imprecise, A does not specify who is to marry Anne. B substitutes an illogical coordinate predicate for the needed purpose clause; because the annulment had not yet been granted. Henry could not remarry. C lacks an appropriate conjunction, and the infinitive clause to be married to ... makes this choice awkward and unidiomatic. (虽然根据其他原则可以做出正确选项，但是不明白为什么ets可以直接看出缺少了一个连词，并且不定式表达是arkward的，我最怕的就是这个单词了，动不动arkward,我都不知道为什么。虽然不一定以这个作为选择标准，但是搞懂了，对做出正确选择的机会会增大)lthough E uses an appropriate conjunction, in order that, the verb form would marry is unidiomatic and illogical (might marry would be better).
这题以前讨论过很多次,你可以在CD里搜一搜,看看他们的讨论,挺受益的.
有可能走极端了，本来式选出答案久好，现在也多研究下小问题。谢谢大家的指点
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2004-5-27 23:56:00
楼主
