pls dont mind that i dont wanna disclose my decision on which to pick. personally and subjectively but not applicable to everyone, I will choose by the interview experience i had with the two schools. to be precise, it is how the background of the interviewer related to my experience and aspiration. That somehow shows the amount of support i ll have during the course of my study, and also shows the resource the school has put on recruiting faculty in my concentration. i know it is not really comprehensive but that is how my feeling tells me... objectively, the HSBC loan, selective and small class size, cheaper tuition fee and better structured curriculum are factors that make cambridege more appealling to me than oxford; while name of oxford and possibly stronger finance (but not guarantted stronger MBA in finance, coz some finance courses may not be made accessible to mba students) are the factors that make the reverse. btw during the interviews both schools indicated to me internship was not a popular option in their mba program coz many students chose not to do so. definitely scholarship/bursary will be another concern, and sad to say i got none from both schools thus far, except application email of oxford's skoll which is unfortunately designed for social/community field mba students... that is how i think. just let me know if anyone has other thoughts or i am wrong on anything. cheers. -- by 会员 mac000 (2011/3/15 14:16:05)
当然不介意。谢谢mac000大大的精彩分享，不论您选择哪一所，相信都不会让你失望的。cheers. | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-3-11 03:42:43
楼主
