深讨 OG 19

bunnier

谢谢 cmtn gg and babypace mm!
When the "with" phrase is placed at the beginning, it's quite clear what 修饰主语 is. But the phrase is placed at the end... it's very confusing to bunnier. For explame, what's wrong with Da Quan 73A?

Alaska regularly deposits some of its profits from the sale of oil into a special fund, with the intention to sustain the state's economy after the exhaustion of its oil reserves.

笨笨地问: Alaska has the intention? Or a special fund has the intention?

bunnier

Regarding da quan 73. See http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=28551

Reading it and thinking about ggmm's responses, I finally understand it: "with" 可以做定语修饰或状语修饰. With this understanding (and thus, the understanding of sentences), we can actually choose the best answer!

bunnier

以下是引用cmtn在2004-5-25 15:12:00的发言：

But why with in here does not 紧跟被修饰的中心词"rice"，but close to "protein"?

If 是原因状语, then with modifies the whole sentence (or has) not rice, right bunnier?

I think that  原因状语 may be more reasonable.

Yes, GG!  给你一块

babypace

这道大全的题目我觉得是如果没有C选项的话，A也可以。但是明显的C优于A。“with"放在后面也是修饰主语alaska的。前人分析动词优于抽象词，很有帮助。

colacat

顶上来，我觉的with...是独立结构，修饰的是protein

同样的情况，可见OG 113

Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and saw monkeys sleeping on the branches. whose arms and legs hang like socks on a clothesline.

(A)  saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang

(B)   saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs were hanging

(C)  saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging

(D)  seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging

(E)   seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs have hung

Choice D, the best answer, not only forms a correct and clear sentence by supplying the present perfect verb have ... seen, but also solves the problem of the whose ... clause by using the appropriately placed adverbial phrase with arms and legs hanging... to modify sleeping.

这里的with修饰的就是monkey

liliy4gmat

with +n.+adj.是一种独立主格阿，做壮语与主句形成紧密地逻辑关系。

所以我认为是说rice的

colacat

独立结构的主语不能和主句的主语一致，所以with独立结构这里修饰的应该是protein

liliy4gmat

是独立主格没有错！！！

其实无所谓修饰谁吧，因为他和主句有关系可是没有那么紧密才用独立主格来表达嘛

追逐梦想2006

一个傻问题

为什么with不能非限定修饰wheat？

In addition to having more protein than wheat does, rice has protein of higher quality than that in wheat, with more of the amino acids essential to the human diet.

再过5天就要考了，竟然连with结构还没有搞透彻!