请问OG85和86 之比较

snowfield

以下是引用cocoabean在2005-1-5 10:30:00的发言：

请问在OG的解释中: In addition, all of the choices except B use plural verbs after that, thus illogically stating either that bygone styles of furniture and fixtures, or fixtures alone, are reviving the particular pieces mentioned,

为什么OG不说illogically stating either that bygone styles of furniture and fixtures,
                    furniture and fixtures, or fixtures alone 呢?

请问在 N1 for N2 of N3 and N4 that +V +O 的结构中, that有没有可能指代N3+ N4呀??? 如果满足主谓一致和逻辑合理的话.

谢谢!

如果能保证逻辑和主谓一致的话，上述假设是有可能的，但鉴于上述结构的复杂性，可能难以判断逻辑的合理性，从而导致歧义。