ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2158|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道GWD和Prep的题~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-1-27 20:31:50 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.



A.Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

B.Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C.Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

D.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
E.Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-1-27 20:50:19 | 只看该作者
lz请看:
这句话是这样的——Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington outnumber her letters to anyone else.
outnumber是整句话的谓语动词。
which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886是修饰letters的。
这道题是有点儿复杂的。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-27 21:41:50 | 只看该作者
A中outnumbering 分词短语作状语为什么不可以呢?
地板
发表于 2011-1-27 21:53:27 | 只看该作者
动词由于分词,这是根据GMAT 的简洁原则:
实义名词>v.>adj.>抽象n.>分词或动名词>从句
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-27 22:08:49 | 只看该作者
谢谢evelyn205205,这里的简洁原则我明白,不过本题中原句的逻辑重心在信的时间上,outnumber后面的只是其补充说明的作用,而E选项直接就把句子的逻辑重心改变了,不是说在原句没有明显语法错误的情况下,不要轻易改变其意思么,我想这里的意思也包括其要表达的逻辑重点吧~

但是答案是E,所以我觉得是不是A里面确实有致命的语法错误才导致不能选,而不仅仅是因为表达方式上不如E好
6#
发表于 2011-1-27 22:13:27 | 只看该作者
逻辑上讲,outnumber作为整句的核心是最合适的。but judging from it is demanding and not recommended.
语法上讲,outnumbering离其修饰的成分were written太远,在读到outnumbering的时候我已经confuse它在修饰谁了,语法上已经去就近修饰ending了(ending也是一个动名词)。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-27 22:27:41 | 只看该作者
谢谢版大,关于分词修饰的问题还是拿捏不好,尤其是该修饰的对象,我再理解理解吧
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 01:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部