ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2445|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

AA105 help~~14号考试 真的找不出来3个攻击点啊

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-12-6 00:02:03 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
105. The following appeared in an editorial from a newspaper serving the town of Saluda.
“The Saluda Consolidated High School offers over 200 different courses from which its students can choose. A much smaller private school down the street offers a basic curriculum of only 80 different courses, but it consistently sends a higher proportion of its graduating seniors on to college than Consolidated does. By eliminating at least half of the courses offered there and focusing on a basic curriculum, we could improve student performance at Consolidated and also save many tax dollars.”
1. 忽略他因.可能那个only have 80 different courses 的学校的课程设立虽少 但是教师素质高,教学设备先进,纪律性强   basic curriculum 是否为a higher proportion of its graduating seniors 的唯一原因.
只能找到这一个 5555555555555555   help me!!!!!!!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-12-6 00:43:38 | 只看该作者
提供一个前辈的思路 希望有帮助

1 Causal oversimplification
2 False analogy
3 It is likely that the smaller private school is incapable of offering more courses, or else its students can have better performance.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-12-6 01:00:01 | 只看该作者

可以稍微详细解释下不 我有点小晕乎,啊 嘿嘿 谢谢啦

提供一个前辈的思路 希望有帮助

1 Causal oversimplification
2 False analogy
3 It is likely that the smaller private school is incapable of offering more courses, or else its students can have better performance.
-- by 会员 mikiqmouse (2010/12/6 0:43:38)

地板
发表于 2010-12-6 14:45:43 | 只看该作者
1 私利学校的成功不一定是因为课程少 如果他们有更多的课能有更高的升学率
2 教学成果 不仅仅是高的升学率 还要看其他 比如各类奖项
3 减少课程不一定能省钱
5#
发表于 2010-12-6 15:37:39 | 只看该作者
1.这个比较不成立,因为他们的生源和教育资源不一样。
2.升学率不是衡量学校教学质量的唯一标准。
3.可以攻击这家报纸有既得利益,不中立。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 13:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部