ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: freedownload
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]大全194(OG192)

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2006-3-26 01:20:00 | 只看该作者
up
12#
发表于 2008-9-22 16:42:00 | 只看该作者

A的确比较awkward。如果算对,那就是只能算倒装。= to which the words have been added,"have been added" 提前

1。to which = where 作状语,主语得到后面找。 不能拿掉 to,单独让which作主语

Agree

2。没听过介词自个单独提前,要提前也要带其宾语一起走,这里which就是to的宾语。

A的问题是倒装太多。一般的倒装是“介词短语+谓语+主语+谓语和宾语的其余部分”,比如in his notebook has the event been described in details,本题中把其余部分也一起提前了,给人感觉不伦不类,所以awkward。

3。看看这个介词单独提前的例子:Water is added to wine. (water为主语)和 To water is added wine (wine为主语). 意思全变了。

Agree,本题中to which(17th-centrury French) Engliash, Spanish, and Italian words have been added正是把介词和其所修饰部分一起提前倒装的。

13#
发表于 2010-8-12 13:52:14 | 只看该作者
我觉得可以这样理解:

原句想表达的意思是 sb. add words to French, 而这里没有主语sb.,即使谁发动add的这个动作的,我们不得而之,这样的情况下,为了避免主语sb.,我们就要采取倒装,即words are added to French,在本句中French提前,用which指代,就变成了French which words are added to;在进一步将to提前变成French to which words are added

因此,其演变过程为:sb. add words to French → words are added to French → French which words are added to → French to which words are added

这样就可以看出AB选项是错误的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 23:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部