一道PP语法题，关于比较，大家帮忙看看啊（几乎每套GWD和PP题多会有1道类似的题，很典型）

mudiduange

A study published in the British Medical Journal showed that women who ate nuts more than five times a week were about one third less likely to suffer from coronary heart disease as those who ate no nuts at all.

选项一：than women eating
选项二：than were those who ate

我的疑惑：前后比较对象是吃NUT的妇女和不吃NUT的妇女，选项一正是说的这一点；为何是选项二呢？

elaineyll

呵呵，我们差不多同时发贴问比较题的，我看你这道选项一跟我问的题也挺相似

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-486157-1-1.html

elaineyll

你这道题我是这么理解的：
比较的对象不是 吃坚果的女性 和 不吃坚果的女性，
而是 吃坚果女性患冠心病的可能性(women who ate nuts ... were ... less likely to suffer from coronary heart disease) 和 不吃坚果的女性患冠心病的可能性(than were those who ate no nuts at all).

than were those ...中的were是很关键的，补全了就是were likely to suffer...

mudiduange

呵呵，谢谢