大全541， 还不明白

catking2003

ABC是典型的ETS错误嘛，即“merging the nuclei of atoms rather than splitting them apart”搞不清是修饰前面的nuclear fushion 还是后面的nuclear reactors啊，因为这个状语从句既可以表示nuclear fushion “merging the nuclei of atoms rather than splitting them apart”也可以nuclear reactors“merging the nuclei of atoms rather than splitting them apart” 另外本人是有保留的相信-ing就近修饰的，因为有太多例外了.......

(不知道有人说过这个没?)

RayBear

同意loooook的分析。但正确答案不是E而是C，OG11TH上有这道题（104）。只是解释看的不是很明白。

请持有OG11TH的G友支持一下：我说得没错呀。

香香茶

OG 11 此题正确答案为C。

对于C的解释是：

Correct. Rather than is a correct idiom for comparison in this sentence; as is followed by a clause with a subject, nuclear reactors, and a verb, do; the comparison is clear and complete.

zimerman

E  

Illogical and awkward construction incorrectly makes
        merges the second verb of the restrictive
            clause and a separate action parallel to
        powers; comparison is awkwardly drawn; switch from nuclear to atomic is unexplained and unsupported

judiwind2006

up

jamesyeah

个人认为：E的them 到底是指代哪个呢，是 atoms还是 reactors，不清楚，产生了歧异。所以我认为E不可选。

ana9

以下是引用jamesyeah在2006-9-12 15:32:00的发言：
个人认为：E的them 到底是指代哪个呢，是 atoms还是 reactors，不清楚，产生了歧异。所以我认为E不可选。

make sense~~