Very true. Very few Indians have English names. So I guess it is okay.
That's a good point, but that question really only applies to Indians. For whatever reason, there are not as many Japanese or Eastern Europeans applying for these jobs. (I think most Japanese candidates tend to go back to Japan, and Europeans tend to apply to London). For Indians, you actually can't tell if they are "foreign" or not from just their names. Most American-born Indians still have Indian names. But for Chinese, the difference is very clear. Most (95% +) ABC have names like "Michael Chen" or "Michelle Liu", so when you come across a first name that's in Chinese phonics, they are almost always foreign visa holders from China. So in a way, you can say that the early Chinese immigrants were so desperate to assimilate, they gave up that part of their heritage and created an unfair disadvantage for Chinese nationals. But there's no way to go back and change history, so it's what it is. -- by 会员 REgirl07 (2010/5/28 12:42:14)
|