The contractor and the engineer agree on the cause of the bridge failure, but both blame the other.
- both blame the other
- each blames the other
- each blame the other person
- both are blaming the other
- each blames one another
这道题答案是B 但是我之前做过一道prep的题,说the other 不能单独使用,要用 one...the other才行,所以直接把AB排除了选的E 请问NN这里为什么又可以用呢? PREP的题和解释我贴在下面了~
17. (25335-!-item-!-188;#058&002335)
The success of the program to eradicate smallpox has stimulated experts to pursue what they had
not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of the other infections such as
(A) what they had not previously considered possible--better control, if not eradication, of the other
(B) what they had not previously considered a possibility--better control, if not eradication, of such
(C) something they had not previously considered possible-better control, if not eradication, of such
(D) something not considered a previous possibility--better control and perhaps eradication, of
(E) the possibility of what they had not previously considered--better control and possibly
eradication of infections like
句子结构:The success… has stimulated experts to pursue…
To pursue something是不定式作补语,后跟定语从句(省略了关系代词that)。
习惯用语-such as,表示举例时用such as,而不是用like。
简洁有效,谓语动词后直接加形容词作补语;如果能用名词替代一个名词性从句,优先选名词(比如
something, probability, likelihood等)。
逻辑表达,原句的插入语不能随意改为句中并列的成分,会使表达意思改变,而且有些动作是不可能
用and连接同时发生的,如本题中的control和eradication。
(A) something代替名词从句,简洁;the other结构不完整,应该是one… the other搭配。
(B) consider a possibility表达方式不及直接跟形容词简洁有效;such like搭配错误,应该是such as。
(C)正确,if not eradication是插入语,such as…举例。
(D) consider应直接跟形容词,a previous possibility表达错误且改变了原意;control and perhaps
eradication不符合逻辑,改变了原句意思;possibility与perhaps语意重复;other用错,没有搭配对象。
(E) the possibility of what用法错误,应该用that;possibility与possibly重复;control and eradication
|