AI 一篇 如何破题

蚊子飞飞1号

请问你对access to resources是怎么理解的呢，是媒体么？

bennywang2usa

敢问楼主，这道题库里没有的题是从哪里找到地？

野田大妹子

同LS问啊

silencia1025

额。。。address social problems 是 解决社会问题， 还是评论社会问题呢？？ 明天就要考了。。。。。。。T.T

ccao1988

贴一篇讨论
It seems unfair to assign the responsibility for social problems to celebrities solely on the basis of their status or resources. It is true that the more powerful people is, the more accountabilities he or she should take, in my view, however, social problems are so complex that not everyone could solve only by their status or celebrity effect, nor those public figures should be forced to address the problems that they are not good at.

Celebrities, as ordinary people, do have some social responsibility to contribute to the society, and they do have more power to draw public attentions to those problems by their popularity. However, various social problems today are derived from different social background and those celebrities have no other measures to really address such problems as environmental pollution, nuclear weapons proliferation, or terrorism but to only advertise some ideas or introduce some policies by their brandname. Consider, for instance, such famous sports stars as Kobe Bryant or Tiger Woods, who have been the ambassdars of some international non-profit organizations, either to fight against AIDS or to advertise environment-friendly measures. However, we cannot presume that they can address these complicated problems which encountered the whole world.

Even it is granted that they are capable of dealing with some of social problems, they cannot be forced to take that assigned responsibility and even be criticized by public due to the unsolved problems. Everyone in the world has their own social role. Celebrities, has no natural or regulated task to address those problems beyond their power. It is unfair to force a certain Hollywood superstar to address the AIDS problem when he or she didn’t have time or wasn’t willing to do that. They have rights to decide whatever they want on their own.

In the final analysis, it is more possible for celebrities to deal with some social problems by their relatively higher status or more resources available to them than common people. However, these problems, as mentioned above, cannot be solved simply by the status or the brand effect and the celebrities have freedom to do what they like to do.

andiwu

楼主好强

andiwu

想发表一点关于解读这个题目的看法：
Celebritiesare uniquely qualified to efficiently address social problems, becauseof their high-profile status and access to resources.

1.qualified意指有资格，有权利，也就说名人是有资格有权利，有能力做这件事，并不是他们负有相关义务或者被强迫要做这件事。

2、address看来被很多人理解为“演说、演讲”的意思，事实上address还有一个意思，就是“设法解决；处理；对付”的意思。在这里，address似乎更加应该指处理社会问题，而不是针对社会问题说说话而已吧？

所以题目翻译为中文应该是：名人独具可以有效处理社会问题的资格，因为他们拥有很高曝光率的地位和获得各种资源的能力。

这个题目的理解也令我很困惑，今天写了30分钟，才写了300多一点字，比AA还少~~汗~~大家来讨论讨论啊！

andiwu

敢问楼主，这道题库里没有的题是从哪里找到地？

-- by 会员 bennywang2usa (2010/8/2 16:22:20)

这道题是jj里面的

crystalvine212

天哪 这是我5月发的帖子啊- - 突然发现冒出来了
我整理了AA的思路不知道你们看了没 这个月的AA简直就是五月的翻版
AI 我还不确定 正在看

andiwu

整理在哪儿了？我去看看