ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2102|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG上的一道语法题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-7 15:38:39 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Whereas a ramjet generally cannot achieve high speeds without the initial assistance of the rocket,high speeds can be attained by scramjets,or supersonic combustion ramjets,in that they reduce airflow compression at the entrance of the engine and letting air pass through at suppersonic speeds.
替换答案是
scramjets,or supersonic combustion ramjets,can attain high speeds by reducing
我想问下,句尾and后面连接的letting和前面的reducing是并列的么?为什么这里省略了介词by?XDF老师笔记是说的有介词的并列短语要尽量保留介词,那么什么时候确定保留什么时候是可以省略的啊?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-5-7 20:33:01 | 只看该作者
Since only one "ing"exists in the whole sentence,there would be no other "ing" to parallel with reducing,thus making the parallelism clear and avoiding alternatives that make parallelism ambiguous.In this case,preposition can be omitted.
For exemple,a sentence like:
"I write this posts that can help you get improved and make the point clear."
In this sentence,you can either say that I have done 2 things:write the post and make the point clear.However,what I want to express is that it is my posts that make the point clear.An omission of "that" make the meaning of this sentence ambiguous.If I had written "I write this posts that can help you get improved and that make the point clear.",you would never get confused,right?
In all,whether to omit the preposition depends on whether meaning of sentence will be ambiguous after the omission.
Hope it helps!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-4 23:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部