ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: slamshady
打印 上一主题 下一主题

还是based on,og12-25,28

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2010-8-5 22:01:18 | 只看该作者
28题和25不一样吧。 28,E里面based应该是动词的一般过去式。。
12#
发表于 2010-9-16 21:09:29 | 只看该作者
实在是太精彩了,我佩服的五体投地,膜拜膜拜silent7706
13#
发表于 2010-9-16 23:51:21 | 只看该作者
LZ,明明28题答案是B....
based on过去分词作定语修饰society...
14#
发表于 2010-9-17 15:14:26 | 只看该作者
这解释太牛了
15#
发表于 2010-9-19 10:57:18 | 只看该作者
这题不能修饰这句话么?只能看做修饰学者啊?学者虽然不是基于很多古代作家,但是学者做的事情是基于这个基础上的啊
16#
发表于 2010-9-23 18:11:02 | 只看该作者
The second question involves the use of modifier. In general, the noun modifier (过去分词) must precede or follow immediately after the noun it modifies. For example,
“Shocked by the bad news, Emily ate two hotdogs.” Here, “shocked” clearly modifies “Emily”
“Emily ate two hotdogs, shocked by the bad news” Here, “shocked” modifies “hotdogs”

This rule is generally followed by GMAC. Let’s also look at one example from OG.
Verbal Review 1st Ed. 91 “In theory, international civil servants at the UN are prohibited from continuing to draw salaries from their own governments; in practice, however, some governments merely substitute living allowances for their employee’s paychecks, assigned by them to the United Nations.”
OG explains “assigned by them incorrectly and illogically modifiers paychecks”

Now let’s look at the second sentence:
"Tom nervously watched the woman, alarmed by her silence.
(The phrase modifies Tom, not woman.) "

By the same token, “alarmed by her silence” modifies “the woman”, right?However, here the issue gets complicated. Because by default we know that Tom is a guy, therefore, “her” CANNOT refer back to Tom. Otherwise we will have a nonsensical sentence that reads "Tom nervously watched the woman, alarmed by her [Tom’s] silence."

Let’s change the sentence a little bit, and now it reads:
"Sarah nervously watched the woman, alarmed by her silence."

Now the noun modifier “alarmed by her silence” will unambiguously modifiers “the woman.” The sentence read “Sarah nervously watched the woman, alarmed by her [Sarah’s] silencFor this reason, I’d argue that the second sentence is an exception and that tt is not really a good example. Here is a better way to write the sentence: "Alarmed by her silence, Tom nervously watched the woman." “Alarmed by her” clearly modifies “Tom.”

So here is the catch: In general, the noun modifier (过去分词) must precede or follow immediately after the noun it modifies, as the GMAC generally follows this rule.
-- by 会员 silent7706 (2010/5/28 1:39:02)



精彩!!终于弄清楚了过去分词修饰的问题
17#
发表于 2010-11-18 22:24:56 | 只看该作者
解释的真好!Thank you silent7706.
18#
发表于 2010-12-1 20:50:41 | 只看该作者
分析好强大啊。非常好!!!太感谢了!!NN
19#
发表于 2011-6-22 11:06:58 | 只看该作者
谢谢,终于清楚了,silent7706毫不逊于XDF语法达人啊
20#
发表于 2011-6-22 11:18:38 | 只看该作者
顶一下,解释的真精彩~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-10 02:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部