ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: dajiahaoh
打印 上一主题 下一主题

发一精华题,请大家踊跃解答

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2010-4-17 23:59:56 | 只看该作者
哈哈,看来大家都很厉害。虽然还差一个到5位,大家都如此一致,就破例吧。如果有纠结于A和C之间的童鞋,请阅以下的讲解(此题是在blog上当经典例题讲的):

“C和A的区别是啥?就是say这个动作到底是industry发出,还是全句的主语proposal 发出。这个时候不能根据A认为是saying,就把其它选项杀掉,而应该根据全句的句意,判断说出这话的应该是industry,因为proposal不会自己反对自己,只有石油工业才会反对那个限制柴油机使用的proposal。这背后的判断标准是什么?就是传说中的逻辑,动作发出者与动作的合理对应。”
-- by 会员 dajiahaoh (2010/4/17 23:47:54)



做题的时候搞懂句子意思真的很关键
12#
发表于 2015-5-15 11:25:54 | 只看该作者
摘录一段RON的解答,回答的太好了:

https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/sc-the-en-t9524.html


choice (a) uses a COMMA + -ING modifier -- a very common construction -- and uses it incorrectly.

the short version:
COMMA + -ING modifiers modify the ENTIRE PRECEDING CLAUSE (including the subject of that clause).

the long version:
see here
post30766.html#p30766

...so, according to this COMMA + ING modifier, it is actually "The Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal" that is "saying that the move will exacerbate the nation’s fuel supply problems", while (or because of) sparking a counterattack by the oil industry.

that doesn't make sense.

--

re: (c)

actually, "which" should indeed refer to the oil industry, because the oil industry is saying that the proposal will exacerbate the nation's fuel supply problems.
this is a response to the proposal, not the content of the proposal itself.

so, "which" is used totally correctly here.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 05:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部