今天仔细看了”七宗罪”, 发现第二宗”Insufficient-sample”其实包含了好几种逻辑错误(如果分类更细的话), 具体如下: (按lawyer对flaw的分类)
1. Exceptional case/ (Hasty)Overgeneralization:
Take a small number of instances and treats those instances as if they support a broad, sweeping conclusion.
2. Time shift error:
The statistics from only a few recent years are not necessarily a good indicator of future trends
3. Errors of composition and division
…it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A.
我的问题是:
考试写argument时,需要分得较细一点, 还是就已”Insufficient”来定罪就可以了?
请大家帮助.谢谢!
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-7-30 0:07:55编辑过] |