ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: chengzi1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

挂机坐等大牛解决!!greater和more的区别!!

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2010-3-31 19:39:47 | 只看该作者
刚看到这个讨论。按我的理解,这道题没这么复杂吧?

numbers和number在这里并没有区别,都表示数量。数字的比较一定是用greater/less而非more/fewer。

   the number of children in this school is greater than that in school B. 数字的比较
   this school has more children than school B has. 群体的比较

之后后面没有加that,原因是这个句式展开后原句是its numbers are now five times greater than it's numbers were when ... 主谓都相同而且没有歧义,所以省略。比较中是否可省略的最关键依据就是省略是否产生歧义,是的话就不能省。
12#
发表于 2010-3-31 20:25:03 | 只看该作者
more numbers
相当于 more 个数字
[1,2,3,4,5] 比 [1,2]的numbers多

numbers 是  numerical preponderance
如: the weight of numbers turned the battle against them.
13#
发表于 2010-3-31 22:28:17 | 只看该作者
菜鸟理解: 数学方面,大于等于, greater or equal to. 所以在比较数值的时候,用greater。 the numbers是数“值”。 例如: A, the numbers are great than (表示a的数量多,还有更多a), A, the munbers are more than(还有更多numbers)
14#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-1 09:53:05 | 只看该作者
vetch,flycacao的理解正解!灰常感谢~~~

在比较方面,hughlv 的话我有疑惑。

你说:之后后面没有加that,原因是这个句式展开后原句是its numbers are now five times greater than it's numbers were when ... 主谓都相同而且没有歧义,所以省略。比较中是否可省略的最关键依据就是省略是否产生歧义,是的话就不能省。

“是否产生歧义”这个判断标准有点模糊。。。the number of children in this school is greater than that in school B.  我也觉得没有歧义啊,但是that是显然不能够省的,有没有歧义因人而异,这的确是个难搞的问题啊。
能再解释一下吗?

P.S. 随着more和greater的解决,本帖已彻彻底底变成了讨论比较补语的环节了。。。。
15#
发表于 2010-4-1 10:42:51 | 只看该作者
比较带状语的主语的时候多数要补出 that或thost
16#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-4-1 15:19:01 | 只看该作者
本题的numbers are now 的now不是状语吗?
17#
发表于 2011-11-24 23:46:07 | 只看该作者

一道类似的题 knewton的官方解答


Question #38 (incorrect) The Whooping Crane has successfully rebounded from a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now ten times greater than when hunting and habitat destruction pared the population down to a count of fifteen birds in 1941.


  • (A) extinction; its numbers are now ten times greater than

correct


  • (B) extinction; its numbers are now ten times more than
    your answer

  • (C) extinction, their numbers now tenfold what they were

  • (D) extinction, now with tenfold the numbers they had

  • (E) extinction, now with numbers ten times greater than
    ExplanationThis sentence uses a semicolon properly to separate two independent clauses (groups of words that could function on their own as complete sentences). The pronoun its properly refers to the Whopping Crane, and the plural subject numbers agrees with the plural verb are. There aren’t any apparent errors in this sentence.
    The only difference B presents is more versus greater. Idiomatically, a comparison between countable quantities (like numbers of whooping cranes) should be expressed using greater, not more.
    Choices C and D incorrectly use the plural pronouns their and they to refer to the singular noun the Whooping Crane.
    The prepositional phrases with tenfold... and with numbers... in choices D and E are misplaced; each seems to modify extinction.
  • 18#
    发表于 2011-11-25 22:00:05 | 只看该作者
    你要是MORE就是有多少个NUMBER之间的比较的,应为number是可数N……
    19#
    发表于 2022-2-16 00:25:04 | 只看该作者
    感谢分享!               
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    IESE MBA
    近期活动

    正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-30 03:04
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部