ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches, the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer, so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves and protecting the beaches.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5984|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【在线求助】一道分词修饰的问题(已更正答案,重新提问) OG12th--65

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-26 15:32:15 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
65. In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches,
the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building
parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise
six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer,
so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves
and protecting the beaches.

(A) act as a buffer, so that it absorbs

(B) act like a buffer so as to absorb

(C) act as a buffer, absorbing

(D) acting as a buffer, absorbing

(E) acting like a buffer, absorb

选C。 我的问题是absorbing 有没有修饰主句主语的歧义呢? 感谢同学指教。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-3-26 17:59:21 | 只看该作者
答案不是C么。。。
板凳
发表于 2010-3-26 21:53:24 | 只看该作者
同上~我也觉得选C~
地板
发表于 2010-3-26 22:27:44 | 只看该作者
LZ对错答案了~~O(∩_∩)O~OG上的答案就是c
5#
发表于 2010-3-26 22:31:28 | 只看该作者
同意 选C
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-26 22:57:53 | 只看该作者
啊哦, sorry,是对错答案了,我想问的是absorbing and protecting是修饰 rocks 吧?但是会不会有修饰句子主语the Army Corps of Engineers 的歧义的问题? 感谢楼上四位热心的同学
7#
发表于 2010-6-13 14:20:25 | 只看该作者
是不是absorbing作伴随结果就不需要考虑其逻辑主语啦,只有当作伴随动作的时候才要考虑是哪个主语发出的,求证。
8#
发表于 2010-6-13 15:20:56 | 只看该作者
65. In a plan to stop the erosion of East Coast beaches,
the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building
parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise
six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer,
so that it absorbs the energy of crashing waves
and protecting the beaches.

(A) act as a buffer, so that it absorbs

(B) act like a buffer so as to absorb

(C) act as a buffer, absorbing

(D) acting as a buffer, absorbing

(E) acting like a buffer, absorb

选C。 我的问题是absorbing 有没有修饰主句主语的歧义呢? 感谢同学指教。
-- by 会员 venus2elva (2010/3/26 15:32:15)



我觉得没可能absorbing会修饰the Army Corps。一,the Army Corps absort ...完全句意不对,二,从GMAT的modifier的角度来看,absorbing是修饰紧接其前的句子,前面句子的解释、意思延伸的作用。所以应该是修饰a breakwater of rocks that would act as a buffer的。另一方面从GMAT的modifier考点来看的话,modifier离the Army Corps有多远够多远,不可能是GMAT句子的风格。如果硬要改成GMAT风格的话,我认为是应该是这样的了:
Absorbing the energy of crashing waves and protecting the beaches, the Army Corps of Engineers proposed building
parallel to shore a breakwater of rocks that would rise。这个句子句意完全不对了。
six feet above the waterline and act as a buffer
9#
发表于 2010-7-15 18:26:04 | 只看该作者
另外,从平行结构出发,absorbing 和 protecting平行,共同修饰rocks
10#
发表于 2010-9-23 10:26:11 | 只看该作者
这里 absorbing 和 protecting 怎么是修饰ROCK? 应该修饰最近的buffer 吧?
有点糊涂了, 还是修饰 building???
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-12 02:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部