ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 18372|回复: 23
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 12 蓝本 69

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-8 19:21:53 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon
were built on a spectacular scale, with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were connected by a complex regional system of roads.答案(B)scale, with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,


OG解释:
The second part of the sentence,introduced by the preposition with,describes the structures first in terms of their rooms ,and then in terms of the roads that connect them together.To describe the noun structures,the participal form connected should be used,turning the verb into an adjective.

由此可见 with...修饰settlements,connected是修饰structures

                the settlements...scale,with...structures,of up to 600 rooms each, connected...
为了好理解  变为          ZJ      ,                      A  ,                             B ,                               C  
问:
1 A B 是否插入语?    如果connected修饰structures    B应该是插入语
2 如果B是插入语   修饰ZJ的词 还是修饰A中的词?
3 如果A是插入语   B难道不应该跳过插入语去修饰ZJ的词吗?


问题有点绕。。。不过困扰死我了。。这个插入语来。。。
请求高人指点
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-9 13:23:27 | 只看该作者
怎么没人呀~
板凳
发表于 2010-3-9 21:47:17 | 只看该作者
三个部分并列 都做的是SCALE的同位语  都修饰 SCALE
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-15 16:47:35 | 只看该作者
scale不是规模吗  规模怎么能of ……rooms  应该building of ……rooms吧
5#
发表于 2010-3-15 22:15:58 | 只看该作者
The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon
were built on a spectacular scale, with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were connected by a complex regional system of roads.答案(B)scale, with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,


我觉得of up to 600 rooms each应该修饰structures
可是with more than 75 carefully engineered structures难道不是插入语吗
这样of up to 600 rooms each不就是修饰The Anasazi settlements了吗

都是插入语
OG解释好像也是说of up to 600 rooms each, connected by a complex regional system of roads是修饰structures


这是个什么结构呢  
-- by 会员 lonelyboat (2010/3/8 19:21:53)
6#
发表于 2010-8-16 14:41:13 | 只看该作者
参考国外论坛的解释。里面提到,句子主要结构是 the settlements were built with structures, connected...

(see http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/the-anasazi-settlements-at-chaco-canyon-were-built-t2236.html)


-----------------------------------------------
choice a is a run-on - it tries to have two main verbs without using any sort of subordinating element. if you take out modifiers, adjectives, etc., you're left with the following: the settlements were built with structures were connected. that's bad.

choice b is correct: it uses a nonessential modifier set off by commas ('of up to 600 rooms each'), which, if eliminated, yields the intact and legitimate sentence ...carefully engineered structures, connected by... (with another nonessential modifier).

choice c:
- 'scale of' doesn't make sense
- you can't say 'each that had...' (can't follow 'each' with a relative pronoun - if you're going to use a relative pronoun, it has to come directly after the thing it's trying to modify)
- no justification for using the past perfect ('had been') - that verb, if there's a verb there at all, should be in the simple past (the same tense as everything else in the sentence, because everything described in the sentence is contemporaneous)
- it doesn't make sense to use 'each' AFTER the comma, because it's not true that each structure was connected with a road system. instead, the road system connected all of the structures with each other, which is nowhere close to the same thing. (having 'each' BEFORE the comma makes sense, because it's actually true that each of the structures comprised up to 600 rooms.)
analogy:
the USA comprises 50 states, each of which is united by a federal government --> wrong (the implication is that each state has its own federal government)
the USA comprises 50 states, all of which are united by a federal government --> correct
the USA comprises 50 states, (all) united by a federal government --> correct, whether you have 'all' or not

choice d:
- 'scale of' doesn't make sense
- the use of AND sets up ostensible parallelism, but the two structures given aren't parallel (one starts with of and the other with with)

choice e is also a run-on sentence (you'll see this if you reduce it to its 'skeleton', a la choice a)
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-23 22:57:20 | 只看该作者
哇唔。。。不知道是没有还是看不懂。。
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-24 22:39:27 | 只看该作者
自己顶上去~~
9#
发表于 2010-8-24 23:03:06 | 只看该作者
你选的那个答案,结构就是A IS B, IS C(把当中的with修饰去掉)

awkward
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-24 23:31:04 | 只看该作者
???那是个正确答案呀
我就是不明白正确答案的这个修饰问题和插入语问题。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 22:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部