ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: JerryGuan
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC总结] [草稿] than比较分类分析 ~~

[精华] [复制链接]
51#
发表于 2008-7-14 10:34:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢BZ~

正好对这方面有疑问。。。

52#
发表于 2008-7-15 21:50:00 | 只看该作者
thanks
53#
发表于 2008-7-19 11:53:00 | 只看该作者

关于1.1-3.

Several studies have found that the coronary patients who exercise most actively are at least fifty percent less likely than those who are sedentary to die of a heart attack.(主语相同且有定语成分,必须要that/those来指代)

个人认为似乎放到“1.2 than前只有BE + ADJ,则其后的主语无须补助词。

”这个类别里面更合适些

coronary patients are fifty percent less likely than those...

1.2-2 the median income was $9,000 more than that...

请各位指点

54#
发表于 2008-7-19 12:02:00 | 只看该作者

咨询一下38楼的朋友:

前面说都是充当宾语时,助动词不能省。后面又说都充当宾语,助动词可以省。这里前后说法有些矛盾,望指正

55#
发表于 2008-7-19 13:05:00 | 只看该作者

4
            
宾语补语,比较结构修饰宾语,无须补出助词;

            
making the state’s economy far more diversified than it was ten years ago

可以调整为:A is more diversified that it was ten years ago

it was 在这里可以同时省略么?

56#
发表于 2008-8-15 11:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用oyoungpku在2007-4-28 20:54:00的发言:

归纳得非常好,但有个地方似乎值得商榷:

1.3
    
than
前有两个动词,比较主语无须补助词。


 

1. A study commissioned by the Department of Agriculture showed that if calves exercise and associate with other calves, they have require less medication and gain weight more quickly than those raised in confinement.

这句不补助动词的原因我问了我们的英语老师(哥大英美文学PHD),她说:

      原因不在于than前有多个动词,而在于比较的部分属于不同成分,具体来说就是:less medication与more quickly一个充当宾语,一个充当状语.如果都是充当宾语,则助词不可少.希望楼主能更正一下,这样大家会更明白一些. 另外,如果前面两个比较成分都是充当宾语,则助词可以省略.

顶!

57#
发表于 2008-10-17 19:57:00 | 只看该作者
thanks
58#
发表于 2008-11-1 03:31:00 | 只看该作者

7
                
句子的比较


    

1. In Japan elderly people are treated with far greater respect than they are in most Western countries.

这一句不懂啊,主语没有定语修饰,前后时态也一致,为什么后边还需要THEY ARE呢?

59#
发表于 2009-1-12 02:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用dingxiang在2008-7-14 10:27:00的发言:

支持楼上的

In Japan elderly people are treated with far greater respect than they are in most Western countries.

我感觉这个句子问题出在语序上面,即像楼上说的In Japan 在句首,则做整句的状语,与我们通常见到的比较不同,这里的比较不满足平行的基本要求。

出于这个原因,如果单单把句子写成

In Japan elderly people are treated with far greater respect than in most Western countries.

那么按照OG的说法,则是这个句子than前后不平行

所以一定要把主谓完整的写出来。

我同意楼上的句子的改法,但我认为如果这样改,完全可以把第二套主谓省略,因为整个句子是状语比较,不会有主谓的歧义

Elderly people are treated with far greater respect in Japan than (they are) in most Western countries.

完全赞同。dingxiang 的观点
in Japan 应该是做状语而非定语。此外 elderly people 是泛指而非特指,特指为像楼主所说的有定语修饰的成分。所以这里用they没有问题,可以指同一伙人。
如果改为elderly people in Japan are treated with far greater respect than those are in most Western countries. 这里就应该用those而非they.

另外还有一个make + n. +adj. + than 的比较题,后面也不出了it was,供比较。
大全
10.A large rise in the number of housing starts in the coming year should boost new construction dollars by several billion dollars, making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago.
(A) making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago
(B) and make the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago
(C) making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than it was five years ago
(D) to make the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than five years ago
(E) in making the construction industry’s economic health much more robust than it as five years ago
the key:C


[此贴子已经被作者于2009-1-12 2:57:31编辑过]
60#
发表于 2009-1-12 10:33:00 | 只看该作者

Up!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-20 20:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部