一道全真语法/大全99

primefang

1.                             Although the manager agreed to a more flexible work schedule, he said that it must be posted on the bulletin board so that both management and labor will know what everyone is assigned to do.fficeffice" />

(A) he said that it must be posted on the bulletin board so that both management and labor will know what everyone is

(B) he said it had to be posted on the bulletin board so that both management and labor knows what everyone is

(C) he said that they would have to post the assignments on the bulletin board so that management and labor knew what everyone was

(D) he said that the schedule would have to be posted on the bulletin board so that both management and labor would know what everyone was


(E) saying that the schedule had to be posted on the bulletin board so that both management and labor would know what everyone had been


    


大家觉得选什么

primefang

答案是A, 我觉得应该是D, A 好象时态不对

LES

我选D。


未画线部分为一般过去时：A: will know ；B: knows 时态错


C: they would have to 指代错误 schedule 为单数


E: saying 没有主句。

ohayo

D is better than A, I think

LES

为什么是A呢？我想了想如果A是正确答案，那么可能是因为B,C,D,E均用了have to be/do－主观色彩表达法一定错！但是时态问题又怎样讲呢？求助高手！

tianwan

不是高手，查了一下语法书。

这里said后是间接引语。正常的句子或者直接引语中，must表主观看法，have to表客观需要，但在间接引语中，存在着转换关系，不能完全套用直接引语中的用法。fficeffice" />

Must表示必然，间接引语中仍然用must,

Must表示必须，间接引语中可以用must, had to, would have to.

A的错误不是must,而是后面该用过去的时态而没有。

D的would have to和must一样是没有问题的，后面用的是过去时态，是完美的答案。


LZM的解释（P63/E4-20）不完整，他看到了must是可以用的，却忽略了would have to也是可以用的。

snow_mountain

这不就是大全上的题目吗？以前就讨论过，A派和D派各执一词，没有结果。


讨论诸多。


总结一下认为A对的人意见：


1. must 和have to 的主客观的区别。（这点好像很模糊。单单一个句子，你怎么知道作者要表达主观还是客观？）比较可操作的建议是：have to主语永远 用于生命体。可惜偶就在longman 上面找到不知一个have to 主语不是生命体的。如：


There will have to be a complete ceasefire before the Government will agree to talks.


There has to be an end to the violence.


2. would have to: wordy. 没看出来。第一个例子至少还说明了will + have to 是可以的。


3. will, 和is 表明客观事实。更看不出来。这又不是地球围着太阳转之类的公理。说事实好像太牵强了吧。


我个人还是认为D好。这个间接引语的时态问题好像属于基本语法呀。不晓得A的答案是不是来自ETS。


http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&star=1&replyid=259382&id=22363&skin=0&page=1


http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=23&star=1&replyid=260963&id=8126&skin=0&page=1


http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&replyID=238481&id=31451&star=1&skin=0


    

jnlvo

D 有个地方不爽，就是have to be posted ，感觉就象be able to be done，后者是个必错的表达。

weiyu

tianwan和bryony都是NN阿.


但是tianwan对于must两个意思的解释不知是否可以作为对付ETS的定理???

tianwan

这实际上是must在间接引语中的变化，因为是间接引语，不能机械的按照常规的句子理解。应为语法上明明白白的规定了：

“Must表示必须，间接引语中可以用must, had to, would have to.” 所以这里就把这个中国人看起来不顺眼的would have to理解成间接引语中的must吧。fficeffice" />