再问OG12-SC-133

zylrt

133.Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp’s ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
(A) requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
(B) requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
(C) that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
(D) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
(E) to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

答案选B，我自己查了薄冰语法手册，但是还是搞不明白一个问题，就是with requiring,这个结构是前面加with的现在分词独立结构么？

谢谢NN指点！

kray003

saying that their compliance (with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets) is protecting adult sea turtles
....
with laws (requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets)

zylrt

saying that their compliance (with laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets) is protecting adult sea turtles
....
with laws (requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets)

-- by 会员 kray003 (2009/12/8 12:47:12)

这个句子结构我理解，不过with是什么作用呢？呵呵

zylrt

今天看第二遍，又发现另外一个问题，就是with law requiring和with law to require，B是正确答案，with law requiring是better idiom，查了一些外国的g论坛，除了常用以外，能不能告诉我是为什么？还是不大明白。不定式结构怎么不好？
谢谢NN解答！！！  对了，自己顶！！！

fehler

就是说，他们的网对法律做到了compliance，哪个法律呢？要求安装turtle-excluder devices的法律；这个compliance呢，起到了保护作用

with laws requiring不是一个固定结构吧？就是需要考虑requiring和 to require那个修饰laws更准确。

kray003的解释很清楚啊

AlienX

不動式主要用來表目的...所以to require相對來說不太適用.

FactOrFiction

这里compliance with是习惯用语，这个with和后面的分词没有任何关系。