256. The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(A) The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(B) To the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(C) The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
(D) Writing the only eyewitness account, Pliny the Elder's nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
(E) In two letters to the historian Tacitus, the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
感觉大家对于ets对A的解释感觉比较牵强。我也是很难理解。
只要智力没有缺陷的人就不会认为eruption发生在letter里呀!这怎么会产生歧义呢?
那请问有什么好的方法能将A排除?用逻辑意思来排除是最难的!
还有一个问题,一直没看懂:the nephew of Pliny the Elder 是什么意思?
盼解答,谢谢!
到底ets对歧义的标准是什么?在作题中什么时候用歧义排除,什么时候不能?
总感觉有时候你认为没有歧义(如上题),他说有,你认为有歧义(人是文化的一部分那题)他说没有,郁闷!
nn快来解疑。谢谢!:) |