ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about twice the size of the 6-mile-wide asteroid that eradicated the dinosaurs has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is evidence of the earliest known asteroid impact on Earth.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2789|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

只剩两个~怎么比?在线等!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-26 14:23:25 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about twice
the size of the 6-mile –wide asteroid eradicated the dinosaurs
has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is evidence
of the earliest known asteroid impact on earth
 
 has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is  
 
 has been dated at 3.47 billion years old and thus  
 
 have been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus are  
 
 have been dated as being 3.47 billion years old and thus  
 
 have been dated at 3.47 billion years old and thus are  
CE怎么比?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-26 14:47:51 | 只看该作者
答案是E
板凳
发表于 2009-11-26 15:19:27 | 只看该作者
背下来,:)
地板
发表于 2009-11-26 15:23:49 | 只看该作者
去听听GWD的录音吧,这题有讲到,词组意思的细微差别。
5#
发表于 2009-11-26 17:50:50 | 只看该作者
这里其实...date to be肯定就错了,要用也使用date to 3.47 million years这种
但是date to中的to表达了一种趋向性,所以后面要用ago这种词:date to 3.47 million years ago
而at是强调了一个时间点,所以date at 3.47 million years old的搭配更为合理。
6#
发表于 2009-11-26 20:21:24 | 只看该作者
date to be 倾向于说date后使之变为XX million years old... 个人理解
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-26 20:55:36 | 只看该作者
哪里有听的?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-27 17:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部