ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1582|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GDW26-20

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-11-11 15:05:00 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In 1981 children in the United States spent an average
of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing
household chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six
hours a week.
A.
chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours
a week
B.
chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly
six hours a week
C.
chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were
spent in 1997
D.
chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours
a week in 1997
E.
chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a
week in 1997
答案是b但是b的这个时态我真是搞不懂,请高人指点
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2009-11-11 15:18:14 | 只看该作者
ManhattanGMAT Staff 对于1997在1981年后却用过去完成的解释:
in this case, 1981 is actually, irritatingly enough, irrelevant. the only relevant places on the proverbial timeline are (a) when the number of hours started growing (this is the 'earlier event' or FIRST time marker), and (b) 1997 (the SECOND past time marker). because 1997 is in the past, and the 'arrow of relevance' points to / stops at 1997, you use the past perfect.
if we were talking about a modern statistic instead ("as of today, the number has grown to..."), then we'd use the present perfect.
板凳
发表于 2009-11-11 15:27:51 | 只看该作者
也就是"迄今为止"是用现在完成时
而到1997年为止,是过去的过去,就用过去完成时??
而之前那个1981是幌子???
地板
发表于 2009-11-11 15:32:10 | 只看该作者
应该是吧 前后两句好像确实没什么逻辑联系
5#
发表于 2009-11-11 15:35:49 | 只看该作者
太狡猾了!太狡猾了!
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-11-11 15:51:14 | 只看该作者
确实狡猾。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-27 07:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部