Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.
- Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
- Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
- The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
- The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
- The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it
答案是D。看了以往的讨论帖发现争论的都是B选项
但请问E哪里错了呢?
giving......做结果状语,逻辑主语指前面的句子。 我觉得应该是这件事情为消费者提供了相对便宜的住房和家具,而不单单是the systematic clearing of forests。 请教各位呀~~~~(*^__^*)
答案是D。看了以往的讨论帖发现争论的都是B选项
但请问E哪里错了呢?
giving......做结果状语,逻辑主语指前面的句子。 我觉得应该是这件事情为消费者提供了相对便宜的住房和家具,而不单单是the systematic clearing of forests。 请教各位呀~~~~(*^__^*)