GWD-29-Q29 这道题灰常纠结

2002zerogery

A,B明显错误就是year和per year重复了
compared with 是对比，compared to是把。。。比作。。

gracezz

呃。。。。那个E咋回事啊》

wwhappy

不是GMAT不考compare with 和compare to 的区别吗？我觉得这里应该不是compare to 的错误

embracechange

我觉得compare to有比喻的意思，compare with是比较的意思
as compare to是对比的意思

请NN指正..

KimiHana

A) "previously paying $7 per year" should refer to the students, which would make it a noun modifier, which is required to be placed next to the noun it modifies. It isn't. Incorrect.

B) this time the phrase isn't even clear - "for which was previously paid" makes no sense

C) "previously" is an adverb and should refer to a verb, but $7 is a noun - you'd need the adjective "previous" here. And really you'd want to say something like "compared to the previous requirement of $7 per year"

D) I'm not a huge fan of this source. I assume the reason to eliminate this one is non-specification that the $7 per year required previously was specifically required for higher education. But I don't think the real test would make this the only distinction. They might also try to claim something's wrong with "instead of" (rather than "as opposed to" in answer E), but instead of can properly refer to a noun, as it does here... so it's fine.

E) See above.

                                                                                       Quoted from Stacey
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C错在previously副词修饰名词$7。

雨潇

A) "previously paying $7 per year" should refer to the students, which would make it a noun modifier, which is required to be placed next to the noun it modifies. It isn't. Incorrect.

B) this time the phrase isn't even clear - "for which was previously paid" makes no sense

C) "previously" is an adverb and should refer to a verb, but $7 is a noun - you'd need the adjective "previous" here. And really you'd want to say something like "compared to the previous requirement of $7 per year"

D) I'm not a huge fan of this source. I assume the reason to eliminate this one is non-specification that the $7 per year required previously was specifically required for higher education. But I don't think the real test would make this the only distinction. They might also try to claim something's wrong with "instead of" (rather than "as opposed to" in answer E), but instead of can properly refer to a noun, as it does here... so it's fine.

E) See above.

                                                                                       Quoted from Stacey
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C错在previously副词修饰名词$7。

-- by 会员 KimiHana (2010/7/31 23:44:38)

对，完全同意ls对C选项错误的指出，应该是用形容词而不是副词，我记得好几道题都是这样的错误了
B的这种for which形式感觉很拗口，不如D来的痛快

hanlei8492

C) "previously" is an adverb and should refer to a verb, but $7 is a noun - you'd need the adjective "previous" here. And really you'd want to say something like "compared to the previous requirement of $7 per year"
                                                                                       Quoted from Stacey
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C的for which错误在哪里？which 指代前面的Education，为什么不可以？pay for higher education不是很好么？
唯一想到的可能不对的地方在于：for the education与前面的toward the cost of higher education不对称，但觉得应该不是这个问题。
请解答。

akiluk

同问啊~

eric1105

我觉得B中for which was previously paid $7 per year颠倒了语序，OG12中有两题是说到颠倒语序的。。正常的语序应该是for which $7 per year was previously paid 这是我自己的看法。。。欢迎NN指正~

ccfelicia

GWD-29-Q29


                                                                                                           Most
of Portugal’s 250,000 university students boycotted classes in a
one-day strike to protest a law that requires them to contribute $330 a
year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year.

A.        year toward the cost of higher education, previously paying $7 per year   分词逻辑主语不正确。应该是students paying但是在这里语法上是higher education

B.        year toward the cost of higher education, for which was previously paid $7 per year 谁之前再付7一年拿？缺少主语


C.        year, compared to the previously $7 per year, toward the cost of higher education 1。previously的位置不好 2。未划线部分有个contribute. contribute to宾语不要理她的动词太远-og上面有一些提示考察这一点的

D.        year toward the cost of higher education, instead of the $7 per year required previously

E.        year as opposed to the $7 per year required previously for the cost of higher education  有轻微的改变逻辑。并且the在这里没有指代对象所以没有必要

open to discuss

-- by 会员 sunjin1988 (2009/10/13 11:54:00)