ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 耳朵
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全950

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2008-8-13 22:42:00 | 只看该作者
up
12#
发表于 2008-8-13 22:58:00 | 只看该作者

In A, having less than ... can be reflect "an individual or individuals", not logic
In B, individual or individuals own the building with fewer....with can either reflect the verb own or the building, not clear
In C, a private house is a building ... and is owned by..., then there should be a conj. to connect "eight units" and "no commercial space"
In D, there is no conj. to connect "fewer than eight units" and "no commercial space"
13#
发表于 2013-11-17 16:48:04 | 只看该作者
iamwwh 发表于 2004-3-12 09:40
(C) a building with fewer than eight units, no commercial space, and is owned by an individual or in ...

这里的no commercial space 可以理解为插入语吧。不需要and啊
14#
发表于 2013-11-17 16:53:46 | 只看该作者
wzhyan 发表于 2005-11-27 19:01
950.A private house in New York City is a building owned by an individual or individuals having less ...

我觉得C最大的问题是is owned by an individual 不能和 is a building 平行,而是应该进一步陈述这个builing 的属性。从而扭曲了原句的意思
15#
发表于 2013-11-17 16:57:41 | 只看该作者
希望携手 发表于 2008-5-8 20:00
A为什么不对阿?

having 有修饰individuals 的嫌疑,而且having 很累赘啊,还不如用with
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 14:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部