OG12-93未讨论

jinqijia

学习

smallashley

up

尘未

简言之就是prices this year are higher than (prices) last (year)
但不能用prices of this year结构，因为year是不能有价格的；因此也就不能用those of last

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/18 11:22:39编辑过]

-- by 会员 neomatrix (2009/9/18 11:20:00)

这个解释最后一句感觉很牵强啊。。。
OG12-逻辑29
states that companies starting up this year will create no more jobs than last
year’s start-ups.

上面的这种形式也是存在的。前后比较也不对称啊，为什么不省略呢

用其他方式也能比较出来A稍好一些，
但想知道这类比较是必须省略么，当年代比较时，last year's price省略成last？

尘未

简言之就是prices this year are higher than (prices) last (year)
但不能用prices of this year结构，因为year是不能有价格的；因此也就不能用those of last

[此贴子已经被作者于2009/9/18 11:22:39编辑过]

-- by 会员 neomatrix (2009/9/18 11:20:00)

这个解释最后一句感觉很牵强啊。。。
OG12-逻辑29
states that companies starting up this year will create no more jobs than last
year’s start-ups.

上面的这种形式也是存在的。前后比较也不对称啊，为什么不省略呢

用其他方式也能比较出来A稍好一些，
但想知道这类比较是必须省略么，当年代比较时，last year's price省略成last？

-- by 会员 尘未 (2010/3/4 23:35:55)

好像明了。。。
原题是状语比较，即price this year 比较price last year, 所以可以省略主谓宾

下面的是主语比较，this year's start-ups 比较 last year’s start-ups。。。可是感觉还是应该补出动词啊。。。

求教

JayNicholas

这个其实就是比较句的省略现象  比较的是今年和去年的油价  补出来就是  OIL PRICE IN LAST YEAR

rx_11

我觉得
Heating-oil prices are expected to be higher this year than the price of last year 也不对··因为this year 是个副词，造成了只能像原句那样改才可以·····我的猜测正确么？高人求证··

rx_11

另外问一下··B选项ETS的解释更奇怪：说more than must immediately follow barrel~~~这又是为何呢？？求高人解答···


还有一个问题，B选项ETS这么解释了，但是CE选项ETS并没有这么说，这是因为CE 的more than并没有像B的这种错误呢,还是ETS因为说了B就不在CE中这么写了。。省点墨水?求解·~~~

micro418

今天也看到这个题，有着和大家一样的疑问，翻阅资料后得到如下信息，欢迎大家拍砖。
首先要搞清楚是状语比较还是介宾比较还是主谓比较。
1.状语比较 都要省略前面的主谓结构，状语比较没有歧义，所以主谓没必要重复。即：如果遇到状语比较，直接比较状语部分就可以，添加主谓就是画蛇添足。
Halley's comet cause such a worldwide sensation In no other historical sighting as (it did) in its return of 1910-1911。

In no other election did Obama cause such a sensation as (he did) in his presidential race of 2008.

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion (in this election) than (the proportion) in any previous election.（新PREP2-197 ）

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies
(for this campaign)than (the supplies) for any previous campaign, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.（OG10-198）

这个题就是状语比较 this year 比 last year。

2. 介宾比较 A do sth of C1 by D1 than of C2 by D2.（C1C2，D1D2对等名词）
Rice has protein of higher quality than of lower quality(介宾比较，of higher 与 of lower比）

3. 主谓比较 这个非常常见，如果前后谓语一样，直接可以省略谓语动词甚至助动词。

if you have a parallel construction involving tensed verbs, and the tensed verb is EXACTLY THE SAME in both (or all, if there are more than 2) parts of the construction, then you may omit the verb in all but the first part.

for instance:
the rain was torrential and the wind fierce.
in this case, we're allowed to omit the second 'was', because it's identical to the 'was' in the first part.

推荐牛贴 比较之庖丁解牛http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-103101-1-1.html

micro418

另外上面那个
OG12-逻辑29
states that companies starting up this year will create no more jobs than last
year’s start-ups.

是典型的主谓比较，去年的公司创造的就业机会与今年的公司创造的就业机会比较，直接把create也就是do省掉就行了。当然写成states that companies starting up this year will create no more jobs than last
year’s start-ups do. 也可以

abjure

upup.

good sharing micro418